Evaluating the Risk Assessment Approach of the REACH Legislation: A Case Study

被引:6
作者
Landberg, Hanna E. [1 ]
Hedmer, Maria [1 ]
Westberg, Hakan [2 ]
Tinnerberg, Hakan [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Div Occupat & Environm Med, Dept Lab Med, Fac Med, S-22185 Lund, Sweden
[2] Orebro Univ Hosp, Dept Occupat & Environm Med, Orebro, Sweden
[3] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Occupat & Environm Med, S-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Univ Gothenburg, S-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
exposure assessment; exposure assessment models; exposure scenarios; occupational hygiene; occupational exposure; REACH; risk assessment; risk characterization ratio; EXPOSURE; STOFFENMANAGER; TOOLS; RELIABILITY; INFORMATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1093/annweh/wxy090
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Risk assessments based on occupational exposure to chemicals have increased since REACH (European regulation on Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and restriction of Chemicals) came into force. The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) recommends that chemical exposure could be calculated using exposure models and that parameters used to calculate the exposure scenario (ES) should be communicated in extended safety data sheets (e-SDS) as workplace instructions which downstream users are obligated to follow. We aimed to evaluate REACH's risk assessment approach using the Stoffenmanager((R)) 6.1, the Advanced REACH Tool 1.5 (ART), and the European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals' targeted risk assessment (ECETOC TRA 3.1) exposure models. We observed 239 scenarios in three companies handling chemicals using 45 e-SDS. Risk characterization ratios (RCRs) were calculated by dividing estimated exposures by derived no-effect levels (DNELs). Observed RCRs were much lower than registered RCRs, indicating lower exposures. However, about 12% of the observed ES still had RCRs > 1, after adjustment for control measures and personal protections described in the ES, when using Stoffenmanager((R)). The ES with observed RCRs > 1 were the same by Stoffenmanager((R)) and ART, but not by ECETOC TRA. Stoffenmanager and ART identified 25 adjusted scenarios with RCR > 1, while ECETOC TRA gave RCR < 1 for the same scenarios. The ES with RCR > 1 were significantly associated to chemicals with higher vapour pressure and lower DNELs than ES with RCR < 1 by Stoffenmanager((R)). The correlations between observed and registered RCRs were lower than those between RCRs calculated from the different models themselves; ECETOC TRA had the lowest correlation with the registered ES. These results put in question the generic ES recommended under the REACH legislation. Downstream users may get better estimates by assessing their own ES, especially for chemicals with low DNELs and high vapour pressure.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 76
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quantitative approach on erosion hazard, vulnerability and risk assessment: case study of Muriganga–Saptamukhi interfluve, Sundarban, India
    Abhishek Ghosh
    Natural Hazards, 2017, 87 : 1709 - 1729
  • [22] Pesticides in drinking water: a risk assessment approach and contribution to the Brazilian legislation updating process
    Fernandes Neto, Maria de Lourdes
    Sarcinelli, Paula de Novaes
    ENGENHARIA SANITARIA E AMBIENTAL, 2009, 14 (01) : 69 - 78
  • [23] The importance of problem formulations in risk assessment: A case study involving dioxin-contaminated soil
    Dourson, Michael L.
    Gadagbui, Bernard
    Griffin, Susan
    Garabrant, David H.
    Haws, Laurie C.
    Kirman, Christopher
    Tohyamaf, Chiharu
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 66 (02) : 208 - 216
  • [24] Is there a role for risk assessment within precautionary legislation?
    Santillo, D
    Johnston, P
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 1999, 5 (05): : 923 - 932
  • [25] The REACH registration process: A case study of metallic aluminium, aluminium oxide and aluminium hydroxide
    Willhite, Calvin C.
    Karyakina, Nataliya A.
    Nordheim, Eirik
    Arnold, Ian
    Armstrong, Vic
    Momoli, Franco
    Shilnikova, Natalia S.
    Yenugadhati, Nagarajkumar
    Krewski, Daniel
    NEUROTOXICOLOGY, 2021, 83 : 166 - 178
  • [26] Using the Matrix to bridge the epidemiology/risk assessment gap: a case study of 2,4-D
    Burns, Carol J.
    LaKind, Judy S.
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY, 2021, 51 (07) : 591 - 599
  • [27] Evaluating the Control Banding Nanotool: a qualitative risk assessment method for controlling nanoparticle exposures
    Zalk, David M.
    Paik, Samuel Y.
    Swuste, Paul
    JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 2009, 11 (07) : 1685 - 1704
  • [28] A hybrid risk assessment approach for assessing the earthquake risks in worn-out urban fabrics: a case study in Iran
    Sadeghi, Jalal
    Oghabi, Mohsen
    Sarvari, Hadi
    Sabeti, Mohammad Sediegh
    Kashefi, Hamidrcza
    Chan, Daniel W. M.
    Lotfata, Aynaz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RESILIENCE IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 14 (02) : 193 - 211
  • [29] Study on the assessment approach for crop loss risk
    Zhang, Qiao
    Wang, Ke
    Zhang, Xi
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGRICULTURAL RISK AND FOOD SECURITY 2010, 2010, 1 : 219 - 225
  • [30] Evaluating an environmental indicator: Case study of MERLIN, a method for assessing the risk of nitrate leaching
    Aveline, A.
    Rousseau, M. L.
    Guichard, L.
    Laurent, M.
    Bockstaller, C.
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2009, 100 (1-3) : 22 - 30