Assessment of quality of life indicators in the postpartum period

被引:18
作者
Baghirzada, L. [1 ]
Downey, K. N. [1 ]
Macarthur, A. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Pain Management, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
关键词
Health-related quality of life; Obstetrics; Postpartum; NOTTINGHAM HEALTH PROFILE; VAGINAL DELIVERY; WHOQOL-BREF; VALIDATION; WOMEN; PREVALENCE; FATIGUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijoa.2013.03.010
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Quality of life assessments are increasingly recognised in healthcare. The aim of this study was to evaluate psychometric characteristics of Nottingham Health Profile in the postpartum period. Methods: A random sample of 133 English speaking women completed the scale in hospital between 24 and 48 h of delivery and again at 7 days postpartum. Descriptive analysis was used to evaluate psychometric parameters of the questionnaire. Results: The questionnaire indicated that in the acute setting, physical ability, energy level and pain were most affected. At follow-up, women described greatest difficulties with energy level and pain domains. The scores for physical ability, pain, sleep and energy level improved compared to baseline (P < 0.05). Women who had caesarean delivery had lower scores for physical ability, pain and energy level domains at 1-2 week follow-up compared to the vaginal delivery group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The scale was found to be suitable for evaluation of quality of life in a population of postpartum women. However a more culturally and geographically diverse population is needed to test reliability and validity of the instrument. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 216
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Abraham A, 2008, J BONE JOINT SURG P, V90, P346
[2]  
Andersen A, 2008, WOMEN HLTH, V47, P19
[3]   CRITICAL-REVIEW OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSESSMENTS OF HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY-OF-LIFE [J].
ANDERSON, RT ;
AARONSON, NK ;
WILKIN, D .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1993, 2 (06) :369-395
[4]   Validation of the United States' version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) instrument [J].
Bonomi, AE ;
Patrick, DL ;
Bushnell, DM ;
Martin, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 53 (01) :1-12
[5]   VALIDATING THE SF-36 HEALTH SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE - NEW OUTCOME MEASURE FOR PRIMARY CARE [J].
BRAZIER, JE ;
HARPER, R ;
JONES, NMB ;
OCATHAIN, A ;
THOMAS, KJ ;
USHERWOOD, T ;
WESTLAKE, L .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 305 (6846) :160-164
[6]   Integrative review of research on general health status and prevalence of common physical health conditions of women after childbirth [J].
Cheng, Ching-Yu ;
Li, Qing .
WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2008, 18 (04) :267-280
[7]   Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) [J].
Cieza, A ;
Stucki, G .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2005, 14 (05) :1225-1237
[8]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, VSecond
[9]  
Das S., 1999, MYLES TXB MIDWIFES, P209
[10]   USE OF THE NOTTINGHAM HEALTH PROFILE WITH PATIENTS AFTER A STROKE [J].
EBRAHIM, S ;
BARER, D ;
NOURI, F .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1986, 40 (02) :166-169