Assessment of quality of life indicators in the postpartum period

被引:18
作者
Baghirzada, L. [1 ]
Downey, K. N. [1 ]
Macarthur, A. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Pain Management, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
关键词
Health-related quality of life; Obstetrics; Postpartum; NOTTINGHAM HEALTH PROFILE; VAGINAL DELIVERY; WHOQOL-BREF; VALIDATION; WOMEN; PREVALENCE; FATIGUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijoa.2013.03.010
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Quality of life assessments are increasingly recognised in healthcare. The aim of this study was to evaluate psychometric characteristics of Nottingham Health Profile in the postpartum period. Methods: A random sample of 133 English speaking women completed the scale in hospital between 24 and 48 h of delivery and again at 7 days postpartum. Descriptive analysis was used to evaluate psychometric parameters of the questionnaire. Results: The questionnaire indicated that in the acute setting, physical ability, energy level and pain were most affected. At follow-up, women described greatest difficulties with energy level and pain domains. The scores for physical ability, pain, sleep and energy level improved compared to baseline (P < 0.05). Women who had caesarean delivery had lower scores for physical ability, pain and energy level domains at 1-2 week follow-up compared to the vaginal delivery group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The scale was found to be suitable for evaluation of quality of life in a population of postpartum women. However a more culturally and geographically diverse population is needed to test reliability and validity of the instrument. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 216
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Abraham A, 2008, J BONE JOINT SURG P, V90, P346
  • [2] Andersen A, 2008, WOMEN HLTH, V47, P19
  • [3] CRITICAL-REVIEW OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSESSMENTS OF HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY-OF-LIFE
    ANDERSON, RT
    AARONSON, NK
    WILKIN, D
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1993, 2 (06) : 369 - 395
  • [4] Validation of the United States' version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) instrument
    Bonomi, AE
    Patrick, DL
    Bushnell, DM
    Martin, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 53 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [5] VALIDATING THE SF-36 HEALTH SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE - NEW OUTCOME MEASURE FOR PRIMARY CARE
    BRAZIER, JE
    HARPER, R
    JONES, NMB
    OCATHAIN, A
    THOMAS, KJ
    USHERWOOD, T
    WESTLAKE, L
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 305 (6846): : 160 - 164
  • [6] Integrative review of research on general health status and prevalence of common physical health conditions of women after childbirth
    Cheng, Ching-Yu
    Li, Qing
    [J]. WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2008, 18 (04) : 267 - 280
  • [7] Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF)
    Cieza, A
    Stucki, G
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2005, 14 (05) : 1225 - 1237
  • [8] Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, VSecond
  • [9] Das S., 1999, MYLES TXB MIDWIFES, P209
  • [10] USE OF THE NOTTINGHAM HEALTH PROFILE WITH PATIENTS AFTER A STROKE
    EBRAHIM, S
    BARER, D
    NOURI, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1986, 40 (02) : 166 - 169