A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT METHODS FOR HEAVY METAL POLLUTION IN KARASU STREAM, TURKEY

被引:0
作者
Sonmez, Adem Yavuz [1 ]
Hisar, Olcay [2 ]
Yanik, Telat [3 ]
机构
[1] Kastamonu Univ, Fac Fisheries, Kastamonu, Turkey
[2] Canakkale 18 Mart Univ, Fac Fisheries, Canakkale, Turkey
[3] Ataturk Univ, Fac Fisheries, Erzurum, Turkey
来源
FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN | 2013年 / 22卷 / 2A期
关键词
Water quality; fuzzy logic; heavy metal; Karasu stream;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Heavy metals are among the most persistent of pollutants in aquatic systems due to their resistance to decomposition in nature. Four assessment methods (two pollution indexes and two fuzzy mathematical models - single-factor deciding and weighted average models) were used to check the level and characteristics of heavy metal pollution in the Karasu stream water. Several heavy metals such as Copper (Cu), Zinc (Zn), Manganese (Mn), Lead (Pb), Nickel (Ni), Cadmium (Cd) and Iron (Fe) were tested with these methods. A data set (12 months, total 180 measurements) was collected from 5 sampling points (A-E) of the River. The used criteria were classes, I-IV represents from clear to polluted one. Water quality was assessed as class IV from all water samples collected from the each station with single-factor index method. It was identified to be class IV from the samples of A, B, C and D stations, and class Ill from the sample of E station with the comprehensive index model. By using the fuzzy mathematical methods, the water quality were determined as classes of IV, IV, IV, II and II from the water samples of A, B, C, D and E stations respectively. Introduction of membership degree and weight of each factor to fuzzy mathematical models made the methods more reasonable in the field of water quality assessment. Therefore, these fuzzy mathematical methods might be quite convenient in evaluation of water pollution and classification considering the results of the present study.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 583
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Observations on the effects of caged carp culture on water and sediment metal concentrations in Lake Kasumigaura, Japan [J].
Alam, MGM ;
Tanaka, A ;
Stagnitti, F ;
Allinson, G ;
Maekawa, T .
ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2001, 48 (01) :107-115
[2]   Assessment of heavy metal pollution in surface soils of urban parks in Beijing, China [J].
Chen, TB ;
Zheng, YM ;
Lei, M ;
Huang, ZC ;
Wu, HT ;
Chen, H ;
Fan, KK ;
Yu, K ;
Wu, X ;
Tian, QZ .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2005, 60 (04) :542-551
[3]   Fuzzy outranking for environmental assessment. Case study: iron and steel making industry [J].
Geldermann, J ;
Spengler, T ;
Rentz, O .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 115 (01) :45-65
[4]   Fuzzy evaluation of water quality classification [J].
Icaga, Yilmaz .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2007, 7 (03) :710-718
[5]   Enrichment and fractionation of heavy metals in bed sediments of River Narmada, India [J].
Jain, C. K. ;
Gupta, Harish ;
Chakrapani, G. J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2008, 141 (1-3) :35-47
[6]   River quality analysis using fuzzy water quality index: Ribeira do Iguape river watershed, Brazil [J].
Lermontov, Andre ;
Yokoyama, Lidia ;
Lermontov, Mihail ;
Soares Machado, Maria Augusta .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2009, 9 (06) :1188-1197
[7]   A comparative analysis of environmental quality assessment methods for heavy metal-contaminated soils [J].
Li Wei-Xin ;
Zhang Xu-Xiang ;
Wu Bing ;
Sun Shi-Lei ;
Chen Yan-Song ;
Pan Wen-Yang ;
Zhao Da-Yong ;
Cheng Shu-Pei .
PEDOSPHERE, 2008, 18 (03) :344-352
[8]   Application of two-stage fuzzy set theory to river quality evaluation in Taiwan [J].
Liou, SM ;
Lo, SL ;
Hu, CY .
WATER RESEARCH, 2003, 37 (06) :1406-1416
[9]   A fuzzy index model for trophic status evaluation of reservoir waters [J].
Liou, YT ;
Lo, SL .
WATER RESEARCH, 2005, 39 (07) :1415-1423
[10]  
Ludwig B, 1996, PROC IECEC, P2144, DOI 10.1109/IECEC.1996.553558