Perceived psychological distance, construal processes, and abstractness of entrepreneurial action

被引:54
作者
Chen, H. Shawna [1 ]
Mitchell, Ronald K. [2 ]
Brigham, Keith H. [2 ]
Howell, Roy [3 ]
Steinbauer, Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] Brock Univ, Goodman Sch Business, Dept Org Behav Human Resource Management Entrepre, 1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
[2] Texas Tech Univ, Rawls Coll Business Adm, Area Management, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[3] Texas Tech Univ, Rawls Coll Business Adm, Area Mkt & Supply Chain Management, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
关键词
Entrepreneurial action; Construal level theory; Cross-lagged panel analysis; Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics (PSED); VENTURE CREATION; SOCIAL COGNITION; SELF-EFFICACY; LEVEL THEORY; PERCEPTION; FUTURE; MODEL; UNCERTAINTY; DISCOVERY; BIASES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.01.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper we develop the concept of abstractness as an underlying theoretical structure of entrepreneurial action, specifically to connect individual perception of psychological distance to entrepreneurial action. We draw on construal level theory to model distance and abstractness, using construal as the mechanism where, in new venture creation, entrepreneurs are expected over time to engage in more abstract action when they perceive greater psychological distance. Based on longitudinal data from 350 entrepreneurs, results from cross-lagged panel analysis indicate that psychological distance shapes the actions of entrepreneurs over time through social distance and hypotheticality. These findings advance entrepreneurial action research, practice, and pedagogy by showing that the apparently implicit relationship between entrepreneurial perception and entrepreneurial action may actually be quite explicit, when abstractness of action is seen as a construal-mechanism-based function of psychological distance.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 314
页数:19
相关论文
共 119 条
[1]   Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values [J].
Agle, BR ;
Mitchell, RK ;
Sonnenfeld, JA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 42 (05) :507-525
[2]   DISCOVERY AND CREATION: ALTERNATIVE THEORIES OF ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTION [J].
Alvarez, Sharon A. ;
Barney, Jay B. .
STRATEGIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP JOURNAL, 2007, 1 (1-2) :11-26
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth, DOI [10.1108/S1074-754020190000021009, 10.2139/ssrn.1444184, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.1444184, DOI 10.1108/S1074-754020190000021009]
[4]   Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: Evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs [J].
Baron, Robert A. ;
Ensley, Michael D. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2006, 52 (09) :1331-1344
[5]   BEHAVIORAL AND COGNITIVE FACTORS IN ENTREPRENEURSHIP: ENTREPRENEURS AS THE ACTIVE ELEMENT IN NEW VENTURE CREATION [J].
Baron, Robert A. .
STRATEGIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP JOURNAL, 2007, 1 (1-2) :167-182
[6]  
Baucus DA, 2014, HANDBOOK OF ENTREPRENEURIAL COGNITION, P254
[7]   Entrepreneurs' Behavior: Elucidation and Measurement Introduction [J].
Bird, Barbara ;
Schjoedt, Leon ;
Baum, J. Robert .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2012, 36 (05) :889-913
[8]   The time frames of entrepreneurs [J].
Bluedorn, Allen C. ;
Martin, Gwen .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2008, 23 (01) :1-20
[9]   The usefulness of unit weights in creating composite scores - A literature review, application to content validity, and meta-analysis [J].
Bobko, Philip ;
Roth, Philip L. ;
Buster, Maury A. .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2007, 10 (04) :689-709
[10]   Three Cs in Measurement Models: Causal Indicators, Composite Indicators, and Covariates [J].
Bollen, Kenneth A. ;
Bauldry, Shawn .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2011, 16 (03) :265-284