How should we measure blood pressure in the doctor's office?

被引:43
作者
Gerin, W
Marion, RM
Friedman, R
James, GD
Bovbjerg, DH
Pickering, TG
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] SUNY Binghamton, Binghamton, NY USA
[3] SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[4] NIH, Off Behav & Social Sci Res, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[5] Cornell Univ, Joan & Sanford I Weill Med Coll, New York Presbyterian Hosp, New York, NY USA
关键词
blood pressure measurement; ambulatory monitoring; home blood pressure monitoring; reliability; validity;
D O I
10.1097/00126097-200110000-00006
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background Blood pressure is the most ubiquitous diagnostic recording made in the doctor's office, but the measurement is subject to a number of sources of bias, which may lead to over- or underestimation. The current study examined the systematic influence of the way in which the measurements were taken - by the physician, by a nurse, or with the patient sitting alone, using an automated device. Subjects and methods Blood pressure was measured in 17 essential hypertensive and 10 white-coat hypertensive individuals. On separate clinic visits, measurements were taken by the attending physician, by a nurse and using an automated device (Arteriosonde 1216). Results A repeated-measures ANOVA revealed that, for systolic pressure, there was a significant effect of measurement modality on blood pressure. Physician systolic pressures were on average approximately 10 mmHg higher than those taken by a nurse, nurse pressures being approxiamtely 7 mmHg higher than those recorded using Arteriosonde. The effect on diastolic pressure was similar but smaller, and no nurse -Arteriosonde difference was observed. Conclusions We conclude that the routine clinical assessment of blood pressure would be more representative of daily ambulatory pressure if an automated device, without doctor or nurse present, were used. (C) 2001 Lippincott Williams Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 262
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1991, AMBULATORY MONITORIN
  • [2] CATES EM, 1990, J AMBULATORY MONITOR, V3, P149
  • [3] Cooper, 1997, Blood Press Monit, V2, P35
  • [4] TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION OF BLOOD-PRESSURE OBSERVERS
    CURB, JD
    LABARTHE, DR
    COOPER, SP
    CUTTER, GR
    HAWKINS, CM
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 1983, 5 (04) : 610 - 614
  • [5] THE RANDOM-ZERO VERSUS THE STANDARD MERCURY SPHYGMOMANOMETER - A SYSTEMATIC BLOOD-PRESSURE DIFFERENCE
    DEGAUDEMARIS, R
    FOLSOM, AR
    PRINEAS, RJ
    LUEPKER, RV
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1985, 121 (02) : 282 - 290
  • [6] AUTOMATED VERSUS OBSERVER BLOOD-PRESSURE AS DETERMINANTS OF LEFT-VENTRICULAR STRUCTURE
    FAGARD, R
    BIELEN, E
    AMERY, A
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 1992, 13 (10) : 1373 - 1379
  • [7] GEORGE CF, 1975, BRIT HEART J, V37, P804
  • [8] GERIN W, 1993, J PSYCHOSOM RES, V37, P1
  • [9] CARDIOVASCULAR-RESPONSES TO AN ACTIVE COPING CHALLENGE AS PREDICTORS OF BLOOD-PRESSURE PATTERNS 10 TO 15 YEARS LATER
    LIGHT, KC
    DOLAN, CA
    DAVIS, MR
    SHERWOOD, A
    [J]. PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 1992, 54 (02): : 217 - 230
  • [10] ALERTING REACTION AND RISE IN BLOOD-PRESSURE DURING MEASUREMENT BY PHYSICIAN AND NURSE
    MANCIA, G
    PARATI, G
    POMIDOSSI, G
    GRASSI, G
    CASADEI, R
    ZANCHETTI, A
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 1987, 9 (02) : 209 - 215