Evaluation of the 'Feedback Engagement Enhancement Tool' to examine and enhance students' engagement with feedback on their writing

被引:13
作者
van der Kleij, Fabienne M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Catholic Univ, Inst Learning Sci & Teacher Educ, Level 4,229 Elizabeth St, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
关键词
Evaluation of tool; Feedback; Student engagement; English writing; Secondary education; Design research; FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT; DIALOGIC FEEDBACK; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100907
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Research demonstrates that the effectiveness of feedback depends on how students engage with it, and that effective engagement with feedback is challenging for many students. To address this problem, the Feedback Engagement Enhancement Tool (FEET) was designed and evaluated. The study incorporated a three-week trial focused on writing with one secondary English class group. The tool was evaluated through teacher interviews, student focus groups, and FEET booklet document analysis. The results showed that the FEET components achieved the theoretical aims of enhancing student engagement with feedback on their writing, although not to the same extent for all students. Students in the trial who reported positive experiences with the FEET used it as intended, indicating the FEET's potential to enhance student engagement with feedback. The results highlight various potential future modifications and procedural aspects to consider in future FEET use.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Effects of student engagement in peer feedback on writing performance in higher education [J].
Jin, Xinquan ;
Jiang, Qiang ;
Xiong, Weiyan ;
Feng, Yanan ;
Zhao, Wei .
INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2024, 32 (01) :128-143
[32]   Exploring student engagement with peer feedback on L2 writing [J].
Fan, Yumei ;
Xu, Jinfen .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2020, 50
[33]   Fostering student engagement with feedback: An integrated approach [J].
Zhang, Zhe ;
Hyland, Ken .
ASSESSING WRITING, 2022, 51
[34]   An educational intervention to increase student engagement in feedback [J].
McGinness, Hannah T. ;
Caldwell, Patrina H. Y. ;
Gunasekera, Hasantha ;
Scott, Karen M. .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2020, 42 (11) :1289-1297
[35]   EFL writers' cognitive engagement with AWE feedback [J].
Giessler, Ralf .
LANGUAGE AWARENESS, 2024, 33 (02) :428-445
[36]   Does engagement with feedback matter? Unveiling the impact of learner engagement and grit on EFL learners' English writing achievements [J].
Li, Jia ;
Yuan, Fan .
LANGUAGE TEACHING RESEARCH, 2024,
[37]   Recommendations on Formative Assessment and Feedback Practices for stronger engagement in MOOCs [J].
Floratos, Nikolaos ;
Guasch, Teresa ;
Espasa, Anna .
OPEN PRAXIS, 2015, 7 (02) :141-152
[38]   DIGITAL LITERACY IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: EXPLORING STUDENT ENGAGEMENT WITH AUTOMATED WRITING EVALUATION (AWE) FEEDBACK [J].
Zhang, Zhe .
REVISTA PRAXIS EDUCACIONAL, 2025, 21 (52)
[39]   Enhancing students’ engagement in learning through a formative e-assessment tool that motivates students to take action on feedback [J].
Jiao, Hui .
Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 2015, 20 (01) :9-18
[40]   Exploring Learner Engagement With Multiple Sources of Feedback on L2 Writing Across Genres [J].
Shi, Yali .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12