Evaluation of the 'Feedback Engagement Enhancement Tool' to examine and enhance students' engagement with feedback on their writing

被引:13
作者
van der Kleij, Fabienne M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Catholic Univ, Inst Learning Sci & Teacher Educ, Level 4,229 Elizabeth St, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
关键词
Evaluation of tool; Feedback; Student engagement; English writing; Secondary education; Design research; FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT; DIALOGIC FEEDBACK; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100907
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Research demonstrates that the effectiveness of feedback depends on how students engage with it, and that effective engagement with feedback is challenging for many students. To address this problem, the Feedback Engagement Enhancement Tool (FEET) was designed and evaluated. The study incorporated a three-week trial focused on writing with one secondary English class group. The tool was evaluated through teacher interviews, student focus groups, and FEET booklet document analysis. The results showed that the FEET components achieved the theoretical aims of enhancing student engagement with feedback on their writing, although not to the same extent for all students. Students in the trial who reported positive experiences with the FEET used it as intended, indicating the FEET's potential to enhance student engagement with feedback. The results highlight various potential future modifications and procedural aspects to consider in future FEET use.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   How am I going? Behavioral engagement mediates the effect of individual feedback on writing performance [J].
Fleckenstein, Johanna ;
Jansen, Thorben ;
Meyer, Jennifer ;
Trueb, Ruth ;
Raubach, Emily E. ;
Keller, Stefan D. .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2024, 93
[22]   Vietnamese secondary students' engagement in correcting their EFL writing: Using peer group and teacher feedback [J].
Dang, Trang Thi Doan ;
Scull, Janet ;
Chowdhury, Raqib .
ISSUES IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 32 (02) :453-472
[23]   Higher-proficiency students' engagement with and uptake of teacher and Grammarly feedback in an EFL writing course [J].
Nang Kham Thi ;
Nikolov, Marianne ;
Simon, Krisztian .
INNOVATION IN LANGUAGE LEARNING AND TEACHING, 2023, 17 (03) :690-705
[24]   Student engagement with automated feedback on academic writing: a study on Uyghur ethnic minority students in China [J].
Zhang, Zhe ;
Xu, Ling .
JOURNAL OF MULTILINGUAL AND MULTICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 45 (08) :3466-3479
[25]   EFL student engagement with giving peer feedback in academic writing: A longitudinal study [J].
Zhang, Fuhui ;
Schunn, Christian ;
Chen, Sisi ;
Li, Wentao ;
Li, Rui .
JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, 2023, 64
[26]   'Feedback interpreters': the role of learning development professionals in facilitating university students' engagement with feedback [J].
Gravett, Karen ;
Winstone, Naomi E. .
TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 24 (06) :723-738
[27]   Investigating non-engagement with feedback in higher education as a social practice [J].
Jorgensen, Bente Mosgaard .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (04) :623-635
[28]   Supporting students' engagement with teachers' feedback: the role of students' school identification [J].
Carvalho, Carolina ;
Santos, Natalie Nobrega ;
Antonio, Raquel ;
Martins, Dulce Sofia Mendonca .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 41 (07) :863-882
[29]   The potential of learning analytics in understanding students' engagement with their assessment feedback [J].
Ada, Mireilla Bikanga ;
Stansfield, Mark .
2017 IEEE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES (ICALT), 2017, :227-229
[30]   Psychology students' perception of and engagement with feedback as a function of year of study [J].
Ali, Nadia ;
Rose, Sarah ;
Ahmed, Lubna .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2015, 40 (04) :574-586