A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice

被引:302
作者
Viergever, Roderik F. [2 ]
Olifson, Sylvie [3 ]
Ghaffar, Abdul
Terry, Robert F. [1 ]
机构
[1] WHO, WHO Strategy Res Hlth, Dept Res Policy & Cooperat RPC, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[2] WHO, Dept Publ Hlth Innovat & Intellectual Property PH, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Global Forum Hlth Res, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
BIOMEDICAL-RESEARCH PRIORITIES; RESEARCH INVESTMENTS; TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT; MENTAL-HEALTH; CARE; CRITERIA; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1186/1478-4505-8-36
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Health research priority setting processes assist researchers and policymakers in effectively targeting research that has the greatest potential public health benefit. Many different approaches to health research prioritization exist, but there is no agreement on what might constitute best practice. Moreover, because of the many different contexts for which priorities can be set, attempting to produce one best practice is in fact not appropriate, as the optimal approach varies per exercise. Therefore, following a literature review and an analysis of health research priority setting exercises that were organized or coordinated by the World Health Organization since 2005, we propose a checklist for health research priority setting that allows for informed choices on different approaches and outlines nine common themes of good practice. It is intended to provide generic assistance for planning health research prioritization processes. The checklist explains what needs to be clarified in order to establish the context for which priorities are set; it reviews available approaches to health research priority setting; it offers discussions on stakeholder participation and information gathering; it sets out options for use of criteria and different methods for deciding upon priorities; and it emphasizes the importance of well-planned implementation, evaluation and transparency.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
Ad Hoc Committee on Health Research Relating to Future Intervention Options, 1996, INV HLTH RES DEV
[2]  
Ahmedov M, GOVERNANCE POLICY FR
[3]  
Ali N, 2006, 5 COHRED
[4]  
Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, 2004, STRENGTH HLTH SYST R
[5]  
Andre F E, 2002, Dev Biol (Basel), V110, P25
[6]  
Angulo A, 2006, 1 COHRED
[7]  
Angulo-Tuesta A., 2009, EXPERIENCIAS APLICAC
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Health Policy Plan, V15, P130
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1990, ASIA-PAC J PUBLIC HE, DOI DOI 10.1177/101053959000400420
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2010, WHO research agenda for radiofrequency fields