Compliance with EU biofuel targets in South-Eastern and Eastern Europe: Do interest groups matter?

被引:7
作者
Tosun, Jale [1 ]
Schulze, Kai [2 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
来源
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY | 2015年 / 33卷 / 05期
关键词
Biofuels; Eastern Europe; Energy Community; European Union; lobbying; South-Eastern Europe; ACCESSION CONDITIONALITY; ENVIRONMENTAL-POLICY; ENERGY COMMUNITY; EUROPEANISATION; IMPLEMENTATION; GOVERNANCE; BOSNIA; CONTEXT; STATES; UNION;
D O I
10.1177/0263774X15605923
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The European Union requires its member states to establish national targets for the biofuel content of all diesel and petrol supplies for transport placed on the market. This study explores the adoption of this European Union policy across South-Eastern and Eastern Europe between 2003 and 2012. In theoretical terms, we are specifically interested in examining the role of interest groups for policy adoption. We argue that the oil industry in general and the producers of biofuels in particular will support the establishment of national biofuel targets because they expect economic gains. By contrast, we expect environmental groups with international and regional ties to oppose such targets because biofuels have come under attack for their potential environmental impact including deforestation, a loss in biodiversity, and food insecurity. Empirically, we concentrate on policy adoptions in 21 South-Eastern and Eastern European states with varied relations to the European Union and the Energy Community. Our analysis supports our main arguments in suggesting that a stronger presence of environmental groups decreases the chances of adopting national biofuel targets across our country sample while producer interests tend to increase adoptions. This finding holds true also when controlling for a country's European Union membership and accession perspective, membership in the Energy Community, and additional domestic-level factors. These results add more generally to our understanding about compliance with European Union policies and environmental governance.
引用
收藏
页码:950 / 968
页数:19
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   EU Biofuels Sustainability Standards and Certification Systems - How to Seek WTO-Compatibility [J].
Ackrill, Robert ;
Kay, Adrian .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 62 (03) :551-564
[2]  
Andonova L., 2004, TRANSNATIONAL POLITI
[3]  
[Anonymous], ANN REP IMPL ACQ TRE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Lobbying and Policy Change, DOI DOI 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226039466.001.0001
[5]  
Bernauer Thomas., 2004, J PUBLIC POLICY, V24, P99, DOI [10.1017/S0143814X04000054, DOI 10.1017/S0143814X04000054, 10.1017/s0143814x04000054]
[6]   Business and international environmental agreements: Domestic sources of participation and compliance by advanced industrialized democracies [J].
Bernhagen, Patrick .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2008, 8 (01) :78-+
[7]   Air pollution and business political influence in fifteen OECD countries [J].
Bernhagen, Patrick .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2012, 30 (02) :362-380
[8]   The temporal dimension of the credibility of EU conditionality and candidate states' compliance with the acquis communautaire, 1998-2009 [J].
Boehmelt, Tobias ;
Freyburg, Tina .
EUROPEAN UNION POLITICS, 2013, 14 (02) :250-272
[9]   From Europeanisation to Diffusion: Introduction [J].
Boerzel, Tanja A. ;
Risse, Thomas .
WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2012, 35 (01) :1-19
[10]   Obstinate and Inefficient: Why Member States Do Not Comply With European Law [J].
Boerzel, Tanja A. ;
Hofmann, Tobias ;
Panke, Diana ;
Sprungk, Carina .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2010, 43 (11) :1363-1390