Judgments of discrete and continuous quantity: An illusory Stroop effect

被引:34
作者
Barth, Hilary C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wesleyan Univ, Dept Psychol, Middletown, CT 06459 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Numerical cognition; Discrete quantity; Continuous quantity;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2008.09.002
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Evidence from human cognitive neuroscience, animal neurophysiology, and behavioral research demonstrates that human adults, infants, and children share a common nonverbal quantity processing system with nonhuman animals. This system appears to represent both discrete and continuous quantity, but the proper characterization of the relationship between judgments of discrete and continuous quantity remains controversial. Some researchers have suggested that both continuous and discrete quantity may be automatically extracted from a scene and represented internally, and that competition between these representations leads to Stroop interference. Here, four experiments provide evidence for a different explanation of adults' performance on the types of tasks that have been said to demonstrate Stroop interference between representations of discrete and continuous quantity. Our well-established tendency to underestimate individual two-dimensional areas can provide an alternative explanation (introduced here as the "illusory-Stroop" hypothesis). Though these experiments were constructed like Stroop tasks, and they produce patterns of performance that initially appear consistent with Stroop interference, Stroop interference effects are not involved. Implications for models of the construction of cumulative area representations and for theories of discrete and continuous quantity processing in large sets are discussed. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 266
页数:16
相关论文
共 51 条
[41]   Multiple cues for quantification in infancy: Is number one of them? [J].
Mix, KS ;
Huttenlocher, J ;
Levine, SC .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2002, 128 (02) :278-294
[42]   Better than average: Alternatives to statistical summary representations for rapid judgments of average size [J].
Myczek, Kristoffer ;
Simons, Daniel J. .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2008, 70 (05) :772-788
[43]   The nativist-empiricist controversy in the context of recent research on spatial and quantitative development [J].
Newcombe, NS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2002, 13 (05) :395-401
[44]   Counting on neurons: The neurobiology of numerical competence [J].
Nieder, A .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 6 (03) :177-190
[45]  
SUSSMAN RS, PERCEPTION IN PRESS
[46]   THE JUDGMENT OF SIZE [J].
TEGHTSOONIAN, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1965, 78 (03) :392-402
[47]   Six-month-old infants use analog magnitudes to represent duration [J].
vanMarle, Kristy ;
Wynn, Karen .
DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2006, 9 (05) :F41-F49
[48]   A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity [J].
Walsh, V .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2003, 7 (11) :483-488
[49]   The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit [J].
Wichmann, FA ;
Hill, NJ .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2001, 63 (08) :1293-1313
[50]   Numerosity discrimination in infants: Evidence for two systems of representations [J].
Xu, F .
COGNITION, 2003, 89 (01) :B15-B25