The role of soil microbial tests in ecological risk assessment: Differentiating between exposure and effects

The use of soil microorganisms in ecological risk assessment is hampered by an unclear dose-response relationship for most contaminants. Establishing dose-response curves for soil microbial communities requires that one have a clear estimate of exposure at the site of toxic action and a response free of confounding environmental factors. It is not clear what methods can estimate toxicant dose at the site of toxic action or determine microbial response to a toxicant. Pollution-induced community tolerance (PICT) is one possible estimate of microbial toxicant exposure. The PICT hypothesis is that the tolerance of a microbial community is proportional to the in situ dose. This method automatically corrects for differences due to differences in soil physical-chemical variables between samples. Various components of the soil nitrogen cycle can act as microbial bioindicators of toxicant impacts. Estimating denitrification activity presents a number of advantages over other components of the nitrogen cycle. Denitrifying bacteria come fi-om a diversity of habitats, can be autotrophic or heterotrophic, and denitrification is a well-defined enzymatic system, which allows the use of molecular tools. Determining denitrification may be a good estimate of effects of toxicants on microbial communities. However, given the state of our ignorance regarding soil microbial community structure and function, redundant estimates of exposure and effect are necessary to adequately characterize the response of microbial communities to toxicants.