Stromal fibrosis: imaging features with diagnostic contribution of diffusion-weighted MRI

被引:5
|
作者
Yilmaz, Ravza [1 ]
Bayramoglu, Zuhal [1 ]
Kartal, Merve Gulbiz [1 ]
Caliskan, Emine [1 ]
Salmaslioglu, Artur [1 ]
Dursun, Memduh [1 ]
Acunas, Gulden [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ, Istanbul Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
FALSE-NEGATIVE RATE; CORE-NEEDLE-BIOPSY; CARCINOMA IN-SITU; BREAST; LESIONS; ENHANCEMENT; COEFFICIENT; BENIGN; CANCER; GRADE;
D O I
10.1259/bjr.20170706
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To describe magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography findings of breast stromal fibrosis (SF) and compare apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) stromal fibrosis values with breast cancer and normal parenchyma. Methods: 45 patients (ages 22-74) with histopathologically proven SF who underwent MRI were included in this study. Their MRI and ultrasonography features were examined and categorized, The mean ADC values for SF, contralateral normal parenchyma, and breast malignancy of the control group values were calculated and compared among each other. Results: The vast majority of SF on sonography showed features suggestive of malignancy: (1) irregular in shape 25/45 (55%); (2) indistinct in margin 27/45 (60%); and (3) hypoechoic 39/45 (87%) with posterior acoustic shadowing 11/45 (24%). An SF MRI showed a mass in 12/45 (26%) and non-mass enhancement in 33/45 (74%), mostly with irregular (8/12; 67%) shape. Non-mass lesions showed heterogeneous (12/33), clumped (9/33), and homogenous (9/33) enhancement. The initial SF contrast uptake rate varied between slow (57%), rapid (22%), and medium (21%). Delayed SF enhancement may be persistent (66%) or plateau (34%). Small cysts were located around/near 21 (47%) of lesions. Ductal ectasia was found in 14 (31%) of all patients. Mean ADCs of parenchyma, SF, and malignancy were 1.32 +/- 0.32, 1.23 +/- 0.25, and 0.99 +/- 0.24 x 10(-3) mm(2) sec(-1), respectively. Conclusion: SF often mimics breast carcinoma on imaging and leads the radiology-pathology disagreement. In terms of distinguishing SF from malignancy, ADC could be a significant and promising value in diffusion-weighted MRI along with conventional sequences. Slow initial uptake with delayed persistent contrast enhancement in a non-mass lesion with relatively higher ADC values are very helpful for differentiating SF from malignancy. The presence of small cysts and ductal ectasia were common findings around/near the SF. Advances in knowledge: A quantitative analysis for measuring ADC values along with additional MRI features can be very helpful in distinguishing SF from malignant lesions.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Normal and Diseased Uterine Zones
    Kilickesmez, O.
    Bayramoglu, S.
    Inci, E.
    Cimilli, T.
    Kayhan, A.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2009, 50 (03) : 340 - 347
  • [42] Multishot diffusion-weighted MR imaging features in acute trauma of spinal cord
    Zhang, Jin Song
    Huan, Yi
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (03) : 685 - 692
  • [43] Lymphoma and Inflammation in the Orbit: Diagnostic Performance With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI
    Sun, Bo
    Song, Liyuan
    Wang, Xinyan
    Li, Jing
    Xian, Junfang
    Wang, Feifei
    Tan, Pan
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2017, 45 (05) : 1438 - 1445
  • [44] Breast Diffusion-Weighted MRI: Comparison of Tetrahedral Versus Orthogonal Diffusion Sensitization for Detection and Localization of Mass Lesions
    Ueguchi, Takashi
    Yamada, Sachiko
    Mihara, Naoki
    Koyama, Yoshihiro
    Sumikawa, Hiromitsu
    Tomiyama, Noriyuki
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2011, 33 (06) : 1375 - 1381
  • [45] Contribution of intravoxel incoherent motion MRI to diffusion-weighted MRI in differentiating benign from malignant breast masses
    Rashed, Dina
    Settein, Magdy Elsayed Mohamed
    Batouty, Nihal M.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2025, 56 (01)
  • [46] COMPARISON OF APPARENT DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT IN DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AND MORPHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF BREAST TUMORS
    Pawlik, Tomasz
    Rys, Janusz
    POLISH JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2016, 67 (04) : 398 - 403
  • [47] Diffusion-weighted breast imaging
    Deike-Hofmann, K.
    Kuder, T.
    Koenig, F.
    Paech, D.
    Dreher, C.
    Delorme, S.
    Schlemmer, H. -P.
    Bickelhaupt, S.
    RADIOLOGE, 2018, 58 : 14 - 19
  • [48] Diffusion-weighted imaging for the differentiation of Ewing sarcoma from osteosarcoma
    Parlak, Safak
    Ergen, F. Bilge
    Yuksel, Gokce Yildirim
    Karakaya, Jale
    Aydin, Guzide Burca
    Kosemehmetoglu, Kemal
    Aydingoz, Ustun
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 50 (10) : 2023 - 2030
  • [49] Motion Correction in Diffusion-Weighted MRI of the Breast at 3T
    Arlinghaus, Lori R.
    Welch, E. Brian
    Chakravarthy, A. Bapsi
    Xu, Lei
    Farley, Jaime S.
    Abramson, Vandana G.
    Grau, Ana M.
    Kelley, Mark C.
    Mayer, Ingrid A.
    Means-Powell, Julie A.
    Meszoely, Ingrid M.
    Gore, John C.
    Yankeelov, Thomas E.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2011, 33 (05) : 1063 - 1070
  • [50] Diffusion-weighted breast imaging. Clinical implementation procedure
    Wenkel, E.
    Uder, M.
    Janka, R.
    RADIOLOGE, 2014, 54 (03): : 224 - 232