Stromal fibrosis: imaging features with diagnostic contribution of diffusion-weighted MRI

被引:5
|
作者
Yilmaz, Ravza [1 ]
Bayramoglu, Zuhal [1 ]
Kartal, Merve Gulbiz [1 ]
Caliskan, Emine [1 ]
Salmaslioglu, Artur [1 ]
Dursun, Memduh [1 ]
Acunas, Gulden [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ, Istanbul Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
FALSE-NEGATIVE RATE; CORE-NEEDLE-BIOPSY; CARCINOMA IN-SITU; BREAST; LESIONS; ENHANCEMENT; COEFFICIENT; BENIGN; CANCER; GRADE;
D O I
10.1259/bjr.20170706
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To describe magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography findings of breast stromal fibrosis (SF) and compare apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) stromal fibrosis values with breast cancer and normal parenchyma. Methods: 45 patients (ages 22-74) with histopathologically proven SF who underwent MRI were included in this study. Their MRI and ultrasonography features were examined and categorized, The mean ADC values for SF, contralateral normal parenchyma, and breast malignancy of the control group values were calculated and compared among each other. Results: The vast majority of SF on sonography showed features suggestive of malignancy: (1) irregular in shape 25/45 (55%); (2) indistinct in margin 27/45 (60%); and (3) hypoechoic 39/45 (87%) with posterior acoustic shadowing 11/45 (24%). An SF MRI showed a mass in 12/45 (26%) and non-mass enhancement in 33/45 (74%), mostly with irregular (8/12; 67%) shape. Non-mass lesions showed heterogeneous (12/33), clumped (9/33), and homogenous (9/33) enhancement. The initial SF contrast uptake rate varied between slow (57%), rapid (22%), and medium (21%). Delayed SF enhancement may be persistent (66%) or plateau (34%). Small cysts were located around/near 21 (47%) of lesions. Ductal ectasia was found in 14 (31%) of all patients. Mean ADCs of parenchyma, SF, and malignancy were 1.32 +/- 0.32, 1.23 +/- 0.25, and 0.99 +/- 0.24 x 10(-3) mm(2) sec(-1), respectively. Conclusion: SF often mimics breast carcinoma on imaging and leads the radiology-pathology disagreement. In terms of distinguishing SF from malignancy, ADC could be a significant and promising value in diffusion-weighted MRI along with conventional sequences. Slow initial uptake with delayed persistent contrast enhancement in a non-mass lesion with relatively higher ADC values are very helpful for differentiating SF from malignancy. The presence of small cysts and ductal ectasia were common findings around/near the SF. Advances in knowledge: A quantitative analysis for measuring ADC values along with additional MRI features can be very helpful in distinguishing SF from malignant lesions.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Can diffusion-weighted imaging serve as a biomarker of fibrosis in pancreatic adenocarcinoma?
    Hecht, Elizabeth M.
    Liu, Michael Z.
    Prince, Martin R.
    Jambawalikar, Sachin
    Remotti, Helen E.
    Weisberg, Stuart W.
    Garmon, Donald
    Lopez-Pintado, Sara
    Woo, Yanghee
    Kluger, Michael D.
    Chabot, John A.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2017, 46 (02) : 393 - 402
  • [22] Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in musculoskeletal diseases: Current concepts
    Dallaudiere, B.
    Lecouvet, F.
    Berg, B. Vande
    Omoumi, P.
    Perlepe, V.
    Cerny, M.
    Malghem, J.
    Larbi, A.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2015, 96 (04) : 327 - 340
  • [23] Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: Correlation of modified NIH risk stratification with diffusion-weighted MR imaging as an imaging biomarker
    Kang, Tae Wook
    Kim, Seong Hyun
    Jang, Kyung Mi
    Choi, Dongil
    Ha, Sang Yun
    Kim, Kyoung-Mee
    Kang, Won Ki
    Kim, Min Ji
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (01) : 33 - 40
  • [24] Application of diffusion-weighted MRI for endometrial cancer diagnosis
    Zhou, Y.
    Jiang, L.
    Nuerlan, T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 39 (04) : 655 - 658
  • [25] Diffusion-weighted Imaging Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Conventional 3.0-T Breast MR Imaging
    El Khouli, Riham H.
    Jacobs, Michael A.
    Mezban, Sarah D.
    Huang, Peng
    Kamel, Ihab R.
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Bluemke, David A.
    RADIOLOGY, 2010, 256 (01) : 64 - 73
  • [26] Diffusion-Weighted MRI Does Not Reflect Kidney Fibrosis in a Rat Model of Fibrosis
    Boor, Peter
    Perkuhn, Michael
    Weibrecht, Martin
    Zok, Stephanie
    Martin, Ina V.
    Gieseke, Juergen
    Schoth, Felix
    Ostendorf, Tammo
    Kuhl, Christiane
    Floege, Juergen
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 42 (04) : 990 - 998
  • [27] Diffusion-weighted Imaging of Gynecologic Tumors: Diagnostic Pearls and Potential Pitfalls
    Dhanda, Sunita
    Thakur, Meenakshi
    Kerkar, Rajendra
    Jagmohan, Pooja
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2014, 34 (05) : 1393 - 1416
  • [28] Conventional and diffusion-weighted MRI features in diagnosis of metastatic lymphadenopathy in bladder cancer
    Wollin, Daniel A.
    Deng, Fang-Ming
    Huang, William C.
    Babb, James S.
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 21 (05) : 7454 - 7459
  • [29] Is there a role for conventional MRI and MR diffusion-weighted imaging for distinction of skull base chordoma and chondrosarcoma?
    Mueller, Uta
    Kubik-Huch, Rahel A.
    Ares, Carmen
    Hug, Eugen B.
    Loew, Roland
    Valavanis, Antonios
    Ahlhelm, Frank J.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2016, 57 (02) : 225 - 232
  • [30] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Skin Pathologies of the Breast-A Feasibility Study
    Skwierawska, Dominika
    Laun, Frederik B.
    Wenkel, Evelyn
    Kapsner, Lorenz A.
    Janka, Rolf
    Uder, Michael
    Ohlmeyer, Sabine
    Bickelhaupt, Sebastian
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (09)