Susceptibility of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococci Clinical Isolates to Netilmicin and Other Antibiotics Commonly Used in Ophthalmic Therapy

被引:17
作者
Blanco, Anna Rita [1 ]
Roccaro, Andrea Sudano [1 ]
Spoto, Carmela Giovanna [1 ]
Papa, Vincenzo [2 ]
机构
[1] SIFI SpA, Res & Dev, Aci S Antonio, CT, Italy
[2] SIFI SpA, Med Affairs, Aci S Antonio, CT, Italy
关键词
MRSA; MRSE; multi-drug resistance; netilmicin; ocular infection; TOPICAL NETILMICIN;
D O I
10.3109/02713683.2013.780624
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to test the activity of selected antimicrobial agents commonly used in the treatment of ocular infections against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) isolates. Methods: A total of 43 staphylococci from respiratory tract and ocular infections were characterized for methicillin resistance using the Epsilometer test (E-test), the polymerase chain reaction for mecA gene detection and the PBP20 latex agglutination test. A perfect agreement among them was observed in 20 isolates (8 MRSA and 12 MRSE) which were then employed in the susceptibility test by using the agar disk diffusion test (NCCLS). The antibiotics tested were: netilmicin (NET), tobramycin (TOB), azithromycin (AZM), levofloxacin (LEV), moxifloxacin (MXF), chloramphenicol (C) and vancomycin (VA). Results: All MRSE and most (87.5%) of MRSA isolates tested were NET and VA sensitive. The majority of MRSA were found to be resistant to all the other antibiotics, with the exception of C. In particular, 75%, 87% and 100% of the isolates were resistant to fluoroquinolones (LEV and MXF), AZM and TOB, respectively. As for the MRSE group, 25% of the strains tested were resistant to C and MXF while 33%, 42% and 58% of the strains were resistant to LEV, AZM and TOB, respectively. Conclusions: Together with VA, NET was the most effective antibiotic tested against both MRSA and MRSE clinical isolates. The exclusive topical use of NET for the treatment of ocular infections may curtail the emergence, spreading and persistence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
引用
收藏
页码:811 / 816
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Discrepancies between mecA PCR and conventional tests used for detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus
    Araj, GF
    Talhouk, RS
    Simaan, CJ
    Maasad, MJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 1999, 11 (01) : 47 - 52
  • [2] Effect of topical netilmicin on the reduction of bacterial flora on the human conjunctiva
    Aslan, O.
    Teberik, K.
    Yucel, M.
    Gur, N.
    Karakoc, A. E.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 18 (04) : 512 - 516
  • [3] Metacommunity Composition of Web-Spiders in a Fragmented Neotropical Forest: Relative Importance of Environmental and Spatial Effects
    Baldissera, Ronei
    Rodrigues, Everton N. L.
    Hartz, Sandra M.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (10):
  • [4] Bonomo RA, 2003, P CLIN ROUNDT NOV 9, V71, P4
  • [5] MRSA and MRSE: is there an answer?
    Carbon, C
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2000, 6 : 17 - 22
  • [6] Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2006, M2A9 CLIN LAB STAND
  • [7] Resistance surveillance studies: a multifaceted problem-the fluoroquinolone example
    Dalhoff, A.
    [J]. INFECTION, 2012, 40 (03) : 239 - 262
  • [8] Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus ocular surface infection -: Efficacy of chloramphenicol eye drops
    Fukuda, M
    Ohashi, H
    Matsumoto, C
    Mishima, S
    Shimomura, Y
    [J]. CORNEA, 2002, 21 (07) : S86 - S89
  • [9] METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-EPIDERMIDIS KERATITIS TREATED WITH VANCOMYCIN
    GOODMAN, DF
    GOTTSCH, JD
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1988, 106 (11) : 1570 - 1571
  • [10] In vitro time-kill experiments with besifloxacin, moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin in the absence and presence of benzalkonium chloride
    Haas, Wolfgang
    Pillar, Chris M.
    Hesje, Christine K.
    Sanfilippo, Christine M.
    Morris, Timothy W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2011, 66 (04) : 840 - 844