Women and their partners' preferences for Down's syndrome screening tests: a discrete choice experiment

被引:36
作者
Carroll, Fran E. [1 ]
Al-Janabi, Hareth [2 ]
Flynn, Terry [3 ]
Montgomery, Alan A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Social & Community Med, Bristol BS8 1TH, Avon, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Hlth Econ Unit, Sch Hlth & Populat Sci, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Technol Sydney, Ctr Study Choice, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
DECISION-MAKING; PROFESSIONALS PREFERENCES; MULTIDIMENSIONAL MEASURE; PATIENT PREFERENCES; INFORMED CHOICE; HEALTH; AMNIOCENTESIS; COUPLES; RATES;
D O I
10.1002/pd.4086
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Objectives This study aimed to determine quantitatively the attributes of such screening tests that couples placed most value on. Methods A stated preference discrete choice experiment was conducted among a sample of pregnant women and their male partners. One four-level attribute (cost) and three two-level attributes (detection rate, gestation and time to wait for results) were used to generate eight hypothetical pairs of tests. Results A total of 103 participants fully completed the questionnaire (63 women, 40 men). Overall, the sample was most concerned with test cost. However, latent class analysis showed three groups of participants whose concern for attributes differed, with cost, detection rate and delay in receiving results being the most important to each. Willingness to pay calculations showed that participants who were most concerned with detection rate were prepared to pay more than four times the amount than those most cost-sensitive would pay for the best test' option as compared with the worst test'. Conclusions Overall, couples were sensitive to the price of the screening test, but explicit subgroups are also shown that would pay large amounts for improvements in other attributes, particularly detection rates. This could provide important information to policymakers and practitioners in antenatal care, specifically in relation to the trade-offs made when couples decide about antenatal screening tests. (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 456
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins, 2007, Obstet Gynecol, V109, P217
[2]  
[Anonymous], A library of orthogonal arrays
[3]   Women and health care professionals' preferences for Down's Syndrome screening tests: a conjoint analysis study [J].
Bishop, AJ ;
Marteau, TM ;
Armstrong, D ;
Chitty, LS ;
Longworth, L ;
Buxton, MJ ;
Berlin, C .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2004, 111 (08) :775-779
[4]   Survey of prenatal screening policies in Europe for structural malformations and chromosome anomalies, and their impact on detection and termination rates for neural tube defects and Down's syndrome [J].
Boyd, P. A. ;
DeVigan, C. ;
Khoshnood, B. ;
Loane, M. ;
Garne, E. ;
Dolk, H. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 115 (06) :689-696
[5]   A qualitative investigation of the decision-making process of couples considering prenatal screening for Down syndrome [J].
Carroll, Fran E. ;
Owen-Smith, Amanda ;
Shaw, Alison ;
Montgomery, Alan A. .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2012, 32 (01) :57-63
[6]  
Carroll JC, 2000, CAN FAM PHYSICIAN, V46, P614
[7]   Chinese women's preferences for prenatal diagnostic procedure and their willingness to trade between procedures [J].
Chan, Yiu Man ;
Sahota, Daljit Singh ;
Leung, Tak Yeung ;
Choy, Kwong Wai ;
Chan, Oi Ka ;
Lau, Tze Kin .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2009, 29 (13) :1270-1276
[8]  
Coast Joanna, 2007, J Health Serv Res Policy, V12, P25, DOI 10.1258/135581907779497602
[9]   Using qualitative methods for attribute development for discrete choice experiments: issues and recommendations [J].
Coast, Joanna ;
Al-Janabi, Hareth ;
Sutton, Eileen J. ;
Horrocks, Susan A. ;
Vosper, A. Jane ;
Swancutt, Dawn R. ;
Flynn, Terry N. .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2012, 21 (06) :730-741
[10]   Girls' preferences for HPV vaccination: A discrete choice experiment [J].
de Bekker-Grob, Esther W. ;
Hofman, Robine ;
Donkers, Bas ;
van Ballegooijen, Marjolein ;
Helmerhorst, Theo J. M. ;
Raat, Hein ;
Korfage, Ida J. .
VACCINE, 2010, 28 (41) :6692-6697