Cervical Dilatation and Curettage in Elective Caesarean Section. A Retrospective Analysis

被引:0
作者
Berlit, Sebastian [1 ]
Nickol, Jana [1 ]
Weiss, Christel [2 ]
Tuschy, Benjamin [1 ]
Mayer, Jade [1 ]
Suetterlin, Marc [1 ]
Kehl, Sven [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Univ Med Ctr Mannheim, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Mannheim, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Univ Med Ctr Mannheim, Dept Med Stat & Biomath, Mannheim, Germany
[3] Erlangen Univ Hosp, Erlangen, Germany
来源
IN VIVO | 2013年 / 27卷 / 05期
关键词
Caesarean section; cervical dilatation; curettage; postpartum haemorrhage; infection; postpartum outcome; MISGAV LADACH METHOD; RISK-FACTORS; PUERPERAL PYREXIA; DELIVERY; HEMORRHAGE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background/Aim: To analyze the influence of intraoperative cervical dilatation and curettage during elective Caesarean section (CS) on maternal morbidity. Patients and Methods: A total of 1,003 elective CS were retrospectively evaluated. Primary outcome measure was the influence of cervical dilatation and curettage on postpartum haemorrhage (PPH). Several subgroup analyses were performed and a multiple logistic regression model was used in order to identify risk factors affecting PPH. Results: Multiple pregnancy (p=0.0025) and body mass index (p=0.0251) were identified as risk factors for PPH. Curettage, cervical dilatation, prior CS, age, and duration of pregnancy were statistically not significant at a level of alpha=0.10. There was a significantly higher proportion of women suffering from uterine sub-involution when the cervix was dilated (p=0.0482). The operating time was significantly longer when curettage and/or dilatation were performed (p<0.0001). Conclusion: Routine cervical dilatation and/or curettage in elective Caesarean section are not beneficial. Accomplishment of either or both of these measures led to a prolonged operating time, without improving the postoperative outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:661 / 665
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Prevalence and risk factors of severe obstetric haemorrhage [J].
Al-Zirqi, I. ;
Vangen, S. ;
Forsen, L. ;
Stray-Pedersen, B. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 115 (10) :1265-1272
[2]  
Anderson ER, 2004, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD004663.PUB2, 10.1002/14651858.CD004663.pub2]
[3]  
[Anonymous], AM J OBSTET GYNECOL
[4]   Methods of delivering the placenta at caesarean section [J].
Anorlu, Rose I. ;
Maholwana, Babalwa ;
Hofmeyr, G. Justus .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2008, (03)
[5]  
BAMIGBOYE AA, 2003, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD000163
[6]   Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery [J].
Berghella, V ;
Baxter, JK ;
Chauhan, SP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (05) :1607-1617
[7]   Intraoperative surgical complication during cesarean section: an observational study of the incidence and risk factors [J].
Bergholt, T ;
Stenderup, JK ;
Vedsted-Jakobsen, A ;
Helm, P ;
Lenstrup, C .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 82 (03) :251-256
[8]  
Bollapragada S S, 2002, J Obstet Gynaecol, V22, P558
[9]  
Cernadas M, 1998, J Matern Fetal Med, V7, P100
[10]   Maternal death in the 21st century: Clark et al [J].
Clark, S. L. ;
Belfort, M. A. ;
Dildy, G. A. ;
Herbst, M. A. ;
Meyers, J. A. ;
Hankins, G. D., V .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (01) :91-92