Using multi-attribute decision-making approaches in the selection of a hospital management system

被引:6
作者
Arasteh, Mohammad Ali [1 ]
Shamshirband, Shahaboddin [2 ,3 ]
Yee, Por Lip [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Qom, Dept Informat Technol, Qom, Iran
[2] Ton Duc Thang Univ, Dept Management Sci & Technol Dev, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[3] Ton Duc Thang Univ, Fac Informat Technol, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[4] Univ Malaya, Fac Comp Sci & Informat Technol, Dept Comp Syst & Technol, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
关键词
Software selection criteria; multi-attribute decision-making (MADM); buying model; buy vs. make; organizational buying behavior (OBB); hospital management system;
D O I
10.3233/THC-170947
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The most appropriate organizational software is always a real challenge for managers, especially, the IT directors. The illustration of the term "enterprise software selection", is to purchase, create, or order a software that; first, is best adapted to require of the organization; and second, has suitable price and technical support. Specifying selection criteria and ranking them, is the primary prerequisite for this action. This article provides a method to evaluate, rank, and compare the available enterprise software for choosing the apt one. The prior mentioned method is constituted of three-stage processes. First, the method identifies the organizational requires and assesses them. Second, it selects the best method throughout three possibilities; indoor-production, buying software, and ordering special software for the native use. Third, the method evaluates, compares and ranks the alternative software. The third process uses different methods of multi attribute decision making (MADM), and compares the consequent results. Based on different characteristics of the problem; several methods had been tested, namely, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Elimination and Choice Expressing Reality (ELECTURE), and easy weight method. After all, we propose the most practical method for same problems.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 295
页数:17
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ADV ENG TECH APPL
[2]   Key organizational factors in data warehouse architecture selection [J].
Ariyachandra, Thilini ;
Watson, Hugh .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2010, 49 (02) :200-212
[3]  
Bailey K., 1994, INT J BASIC SCI APPL, V14, P34
[4]   Analysis of heuristic validity, efficiency and applicability of the profile distance method for implementation in decision support systems [J].
Bernroider, Edward ;
Obwegeser, Nikolaus ;
Stix, Volker .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2011, 38 (05) :816-823
[5]  
Borhani-Fard Zeinab, 2013, Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence, V5, P296, DOI 10.4304/jetwi.5.3.296-301
[6]   A PROCESS MODEL OF MAKE-VS-BUY DECISION-MAKING - THE CASE OF MANUFACTURING SOFTWARE [J].
BUCHOWICZ, BS .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 1991, 38 (01) :24-32
[7]   POSTPURCHASE STRATEGY - A KEY TO SUCCESSFUL INDUSTRIAL MARKETING AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION [J].
BURGER, PC ;
CANN, CW .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 1995, 24 (02) :91-98
[8]   An optimization framework for "build-or-buy" decisions in software architecture [J].
Cortellessa, Vittorio ;
Marinelli, Fabrizio ;
Potena, Pasqualina .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2008, 35 (10) :3090-3106
[9]  
Eftekhari N., 2011, Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci., V5, P1251, DOI DOI 10.1145/1978802.1978812
[10]  
Esmaeili L., 2012, RES J APPL SCI ENG T, V4, P500