Magnetic resonance imaging-based morphological and alignment assessment of the patellofemoral joint and its relationship to proximal patellar tendinopathy

被引:5
|
作者
Crema, Michel D. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Cortinas, Larissa G. [1 ,2 ]
Lima, Giovanni B. P. [1 ,2 ]
Abdalla, Rene Jorge [5 ,6 ]
McNeill Ingham, Sheila Jean [5 ,6 ]
Skaf, Abdalla Y. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Coracao HCor, Dept Radiol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Teleimagem, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Paris 06, Hop St Antoine, Dept Radiol, 184 Rue Faubourg St Antoine, F-75012 Paris, France
[4] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Quantitat Imaging Ctr, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[5] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[6] Hosp Coracao HCor, Knee Inst, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
关键词
MRI; Patellar tendinopathy; Patellofemoral alignment; Jumper's knee; VOLLEYBALL PLAYERS; JUMPERS KNEE; RISK-FACTORS; TENDINITIS; INJURIES; SPORTS; INSTABILITY; BASKETBALL; QUADRICEPS;
D O I
10.1007/s00256-017-2833-0
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To assess the differences in morphology and alignment of the knee between patients with proximal patellar tendinopathy (PPT) and a control group, using MRI and focusing on the patellofemoral joint. Methods We retrospectively included 35 patients with clinically diagnosed and unequivocal findings of PPT on knee MRI, the case group. For the control group, we included 70 patients who underwent knee MRI for other reasons, with no clinical or MRI evidence of PPT. Patients and controls were matched for age and gender, with all subjects reporting frequent physical activity. MRIs were evaluated by two musculoskeletal radiologists, who assessed parameters of patellar morphology, trochlear morphology, patellofemoral alignment, and tibiofemoral alignment. The differences in parameters between cases and controls were assessed using Student's t test. Logistic regression was applied to assess the associations between the MRI parameters and the presence of PPT. Results The patellar height Insall-Salvati ratio was different between cases and controls (1.37 +/- 0.21 vs. 1.24 +/- 0.19; p = 0.003). The subchondral Wiberg angle was higher in cases than controls (136.8 +/- 7.4 vs. 131.7 +/- 8.8; p = 0.004). After applying logistic regression, significant associations with PPT were found [odds ratios (95% CI)] for patellar morphology [1.1 (1.0, 1.2)] and patellar height [1.3 (1.0, 1.7)]. Conclusions Patellar height and the subchondral patellar Wiberg angle were greater in patients with PPT and significantly associated with PPT.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 349
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Magnetic resonance imaging-based morphological and alignment assessment of the patellofemoral joint and its relationship to proximal patellar tendinopathy
    Michel D. Crema
    Larissa G. Cortinas
    Giovanni B. P. Lima
    Rene Jorge Abdalla
    Sheila Jean McNeill Ingham
    Abdalla Y. Skaf
    Skeletal Radiology, 2018, 47 : 341 - 349
  • [2] Association between obesity and magnetic resonance imaging defined patellar tendinopathy in community-based adults: a cross-sectional study
    Fairley, Jessica
    Toppi, Jason
    Cicuttini, Flavia M.
    Wluka, Anita
    Giles, Graham G.
    Cook, Jill
    O'Sullivan, Richard
    Wang, Yuanyuan
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2014, 15
  • [3] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Topographical Differences Between Control and Recurrent Patellofemoral Instability Patients
    Charles, Michael D.
    Haloman, Sean
    Chen, Lina
    Ward, Samuel R.
    Fithian, Donald
    Afra, Robert
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (02) : 374 - 384
  • [4] Factors associated with magnetic resonance imaging defined patellar tendinopathy in community-based middle-aged women: a prospective cohort study
    Toppi, Jason
    Fairley, Jessica
    Cicuttini, Flavia M.
    Cook, Jill
    Davis, Susan R.
    Bell, Robin J.
    Hanna, Fahad
    Wang, Yuanyuan
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2015, 16
  • [5] Are Patellofemoral Joint Alignment and Shape Associated With Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Abnormalities and Symptoms Among People With Patellofemoral Pain?
    van Middelkoop, Marienke
    Macri, Erin M.
    Eijkenboom, Joost F.
    van der Heijden, Rianne A.
    Crossley, Kay M.
    Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M. A.
    de Kanter, Janneke L.
    Oei, Edwin H.
    Collins, Natalie J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (13) : 3217 - 3226
  • [6] Preoperative assessment of femoral rotation and its relationship with coronal alignment: A magnetic resonance imaging study
    McDougall, Catherine J.
    Gallie, Price
    Whitehouse, Sarah L.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2016, 13 (04) : 290 - 293
  • [7] Carotid Plaque Morphological Classification Compared With Biomechanical Cap Stress Implications for a Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Assessment
    Gijsen, Frank J. H.
    Nieuwstadt, Harm A.
    Wentzel, Jolanda J.
    Verhagen, Hence J. M.
    van der Lugt, Aad
    van der Steen, Antonius F. W.
    STROKE, 2015, 46 (08) : 2124 - 2128
  • [8] Measurement reproducibility of magnetic resonance imaging-based finite element analysis of proximal femur microarchitecture for in vivo assessment of bone strength
    Gregory Chang
    Alexandra Hotca-Cho
    Henry Rusinek
    Stephen Honig
    Artem Mikheev
    Kenneth Egol
    Ravinder R. Regatte
    Chamith S. Rajapakse
    Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 2015, 28 : 407 - 412
  • [9] Measurement reproducibility of magnetic resonance imaging-based finite element analysis of proximal femur microarchitecture for in vivo assessment of bone strength
    Chang, Gregory
    Hotca-Cho, Alexandra
    Rusinek, Henry
    Honig, Stephen
    Mikheev, Artem
    Egol, Kenneth
    Regatte, Ravinder R.
    Rajapakse, Chamith S.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2015, 28 (04) : 407 - 412
  • [10] Endometriosis and Its Myriad Presentations: Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Pictorial Review
    Sud, Seema
    Buxi, Tarvinder Bir Singh
    Sheth, Swapnil
    Ghuman, Samarjit Singh
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING, 2021, 31 (01) : 193 - 202