Should I Stay or Should I Go? Assessing Intermodal and Synchromodal Resilience from a Decentralized Perspective

被引:26
|
作者
Ambra, Tomas [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Caris, An [2 ]
Macharis, Cathy [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Brussel, MOBI Res Ctr, Pl Laan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Hasselt Univ, Logist Res Grp, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
[3] Res Fdn Flanders FWO, Egmontstr 5, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
来源
SUSTAINABILITY | 2019年 / 11卷 / 06期
关键词
synchromodal transport; intermodal transport; geographic information systems; agent-based modelling; simulation; disruption; resilience; DISCRETE-EVENT SIMULATION; FREIGHT TRANSPORT; MODEL; DISRUPTIONS; LOGISTICS; CHOICE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/su11061765
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Synchromodal transport incorporates real-time events in a dynamic manner in order to facilitate the most suitable selection of modes, routes and handling points. Up until now, current assessments rely on analytical models. Most of these models average distances for barges and trains via route mapping platforms that provide realistic distances for road only. To reflect on real-world developments more accurately, new thinking and modelling approaches are necessary to bridge academic models with physical transport processes. This paper introduces a computational model which computes movements of agents in geographically referenced space. The model captures stochastic parallel processes for each mode, and simulates decentralized delivery performance of each order in terms of cost, time and emissions at an operational level. Furthermore, we study the routing of individual orders and their responsiveness to disruptions. Computational experiments are performed within a case study which concerns imports of retail goods by unimodal truck transport from France to Belgium. Our findings show that dynamic synchromodal solutions cope with disturbances better, but unnecessary deviations and pro-activeness can also lead to negative effects when compared to static intermodal solutions
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Should I stay or should I go? Coral bleaching from the symbionts' perspective
    Scott, Carly B.
    Ostling, Annette
    Matz, Mikhail V.
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2024, 27 (05)
  • [2] A Post-Corona Perspective for Smart Cities: 'Should I Stay or Should I Go?'
    Sassen, Saskia
    Kourtit, Karima
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (17)
  • [3] Should I stay or should I go now? Understanding terrorism as a driver of institutional escapism
    Abrahms, Max
    Dau, Luis Alfonso
    Moore, Elizabeth M.
    INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2023, 32 (04)
  • [4] Should I Stay or Should I go? Resilience, Intention to Quit and Job Satisfaction among Nurses in Intensive Care Units
    Fureder, Nina
    Herber, Gabriele
    Stadlmayr, Elke
    GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2024, 86 (11) : 691 - 704
  • [5] Should I Stay or Should I Go? Deviant Behavior at Traffic Lights
    Kroher, Martina
    SOZIALE WELT-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIALWISSENSCHAFTLICHE FORSCHUNG UND PRAXIS, 2014, 65 (02): : 201 - +
  • [6] Should I Stay or Should I Go? Alternative Infrastructures in Scholarly Publishing
    Lagoze, Carl
    Edwards, Paul
    Sandvig, Christian
    Plantin, Jean-Christophe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2015, 9 : 1052 - 1071
  • [7] Should I Stay or Should I Go? The Role of Roads in Migration Decisions
    Gachassin, Marie Castaing
    JOURNAL OF AFRICAN ECONOMIES, 2013, 22 (05) : 796 - 826
  • [8] Should I stay or should I go? Factors in household decisions for or against relocation from a flood risk area
    Seebauer, Sebastian
    Winkler, Claudia
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2020, 60
  • [9] Should I Stay or Should I Go? A Relational Biopsychosocial Perspective on Neurodivergent Talent, Career Satisfaction and Turnover Intention
    McDowall, Almuth
    Doyle, Nancy
    Kiseleva, Meg
    HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2025,
  • [10] Should I Stay or Should I Go Now? Or Should I Wait and See? Influences on Wildfire Evacuation Decisions
    McCaffrey, Sarah
    Wilson, Robyn
    Konar, Avishek
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2018, 38 (07) : 1390 - 1404