Patients' priorities regarding outpatient physiotherapy care: A qualitative and quantitative study

被引:10
作者
Peersman, Wim [1 ,2 ]
Rooms, Toni [2 ]
Bracke, Nathalie [2 ]
Van Waelvelde, Hilde [2 ]
De Maeseneer, Jan [1 ]
Cambier, Dirk [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Gen Practice & Primary Hlth Care, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Artevelde Univ Coll, Dept Rehabil Sci & Physiotherapy Ghent, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Patient preference; Physiotherapy; Questionnaires; Focus groups; GENERAL-PRACTICE CARE; PHYSICAL-THERAPY; SATISFACTION; INSTRUMENT; VALIDATION; VIEWS; PRACTITIONER; PERCEPTIONS; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.math.2012.09.007
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background: Little knowledge is available on the attributes pertaining to physiotherapy care that patients consider most important. Objectives: To establish patients' priorities with regard to outpatient physiotherapy care and to determine the association between gender, age, level of education, perceived health, frequency of visiting a physiotherapist (PT), and patients' priorities. Design, participants and methods: 8 Focus group discussions that were conducted with 53 patients were used to generate aspects of care that were considered important for patients. Subsequently, a self-administered questionnaire, consisting of the aspects of care that were revealed in the focus group discussions, was handed out to 20 consecutively visiting patients by 22 PTs who were working in an outpatient private practice. The patients were asked to rate the importance of each aspect. Results: The focus group discussions generated 48 aspects of care that were included in the questionnaire; 358 (81%) patients returned the questionnaire. All the proposed aspects were perceived as being important. The most important aspect was that "the PT is expert in his professional field." Patients who were older, received a lower level of education, were less healthy, and attended more frequently, indicated more aspects as important; however, the different subgroups ranked the priorities, to a large extent, in the same manner. Discussion and conclusion: The findings of the survey can be used to make PTs more responsive to the expectations of patients, to educate patients about the role of physiotherapy care, and to develop instruments for measuring patients' experience and satisfaction with physiotherapy care. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 164
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] The MedRisk instrument fir Measuring Patient Satisfaction with Physical Therapy Care: A psychometric analysis
    Beattie, P
    Turner, C
    Dowda, M
    Michener, L
    Nelson, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2005, 35 (01) : 24 - 32
  • [2] Patient satisfaction with outpatient physical therapy: Instrument validation
    Beattie, PF
    Pinto, MB
    Nelson, MK
    Nelson, R
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2002, 82 (06): : 557 - 565
  • [3] Boyatzis R.E., 1998, Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development, pxvi
  • [4] Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods
    Collins, D
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2003, 12 (03) : 229 - 238
  • [5] Priorities of consumers, providers, and family members in the treatment of schizophrenia
    Fischer, EP
    Shumway, M
    Owen, RR
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2002, 53 (06) : 724 - 729
  • [6] The development of an instrument to measure satisfaction with physical therapy
    Goldstein, MS
    Elliott, SD
    Guccione, AA
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2000, 80 (09): : 853 - 863
  • [7] Patients' priorities with respect to general practice care:: an international comparison
    Grol, R
    Wensing, M
    Mainz, J
    Ferreira, P
    Hearnshaw, H
    Hjortdahl, P
    Olesen, F
    Ribacke, M
    Spenser, T
    Szécsényi, J
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 1999, 16 (01) : 4 - 11
  • [8] Hills Rosemary, 2007, Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, V23, P21, DOI 10.1080/09593980601147876
  • [9] Hills Rosemary, 2007, Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, V23, P243, DOI 10.1080/09593980701209394
  • [10] Jung Hans Peter, 2003, Health Expect, V6, P160