Graphical enhancements to summary receiver operating characteristic plots to facilitate the analysis and reporting of meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy data

被引:97
作者
Patel, Amit [1 ,2 ]
Cooper, Nicola [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Freeman, Suzanne [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Sutton, Alex [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Inst Canc & Genom Sci, Canc Res UK Clin Trials Unit, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Leicester, Dept Hlth Sci, Biostat Res Grp, Leicester, Leics, England
[3] Univ Leicester, NIHR Complex Reviews Support Unit, Leicester, Leics, England
[4] Univ Glasgow, NIHR Complex Reviews Support Unit, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
diagnostic test accuracy; meta-analysis; received operating characteristic curves; TOOL;
D O I
10.1002/jrsm.1439
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) systematic reviews are conducted to summarize evidence on the accuracy of a diagnostic test including a critical evaluation of the primary studies. Where appropriate, the evidence is meta-analyzed to obtain pooled estimates of effectiveness.In this study, we reviewed and critiqued three DTA guidance documents with respect to the graphical presentation of DTA meta-analysis results. All three documents recommended the use of two forms of graphical presentation: (a) forest plots displaying meta-analysis results for sensitivity (ie, the true positive rate) and specificity (ie, true negative rate) separately, and (b) Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic (SROC) curve to provide a global summary of test performance. Two primary shortcomings were identified: (a) lack of incorporation of quality assessment results into the main analysis and; (b) ambiguity with which the contribution of individual studies is represented on SROC curves. In response, two alternative graphical approaches were developed: A quality assessment enhanced SROC plotwhich displays the results from individual studies in the meta-analysis with multiple indicators of quality assessed using QUADAS-2; and A percentage study weights enhanced SROC plotwhich accurately portrays the percentage contribution each study makes to the meta-analysis. The proposed enhanced SROC curves facilitate the exploration of DTA data, leading to a deeper understanding of the primary studies included in a DTA meta-analysis including identifying reasons for between study heterogeneity and why specific study results may be divergent. Both plots can easily be produced in the free online interactive application, MetaDTA ().
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 44
页数:11
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [11] A general framework for comparative Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic studies
    Menten, Joris
    Lesaffre, Emmanuel
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2015, 15
  • [12] Moher D, 2009, PLOS MED, V6, DOI [10.1136/bmj.b2535, 10.1136/bmj.b2700, 10.1136/bmj.i4086, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007, 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.07.299]
  • [13] Combination of the non-invasive tests for the diagnosis of endometriosis
    Nisenblat, Vicki
    Prentice, Lucy
    Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
    Farquhar, Cindy
    Hull, M. Louise
    Johnson, Neil
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (07):
  • [14] Beta-binomial analysis of variance model for network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy data
    Nyaga, Victoria N.
    Arbyn, Marc
    Aerts, Marc
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 27 (08) : 2554 - 2566
  • [15] Network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies identifies and ranks the optimal diagnostic tests and thresholds for health care policy and decision-making
    Owen, Rhiannon. K.
    Cooper, Nicola J.
    Quinn, Terence J.
    Lees, Rosalind
    Sutton, Alex J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 99 : 64 - 74
  • [16] 'Cross hairs' plots for diagnostic meta-analysis
    Phillips, Bob
    Stewart, Lesley A.
    Sutton, Alex J.
    [J]. RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2010, 1 (3-4) : 308 - 315
  • [17] Deriving percentage study weights in multi-parameter meta-analysis models: with application to meta-regression, network meta-analysis and one-stage individual participant data models
    Riley, Richard D.
    Ensor, Joie
    Jackson, Dan
    Burke, Danielle L.
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 27 (10) : 2885 - 2905
  • [18] Smetana GW, 2012, METHODS GUIDE MED RE
  • [19] How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?
    Thompson, SG
    Higgins, JPT
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (11) : 1559 - 1573
  • [20] Methods for the joint meta-analysis of multiple tests
    Trikalinos, Thomas A.
    Hoaglin, David C.
    Small, Kevin M.
    Terrin, Norma
    Schmid, Christopher H.
    [J]. RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2014, 5 (04) : 294 - 312