Structural constraints on pronoun binding and coreference: evidence from eye movements during reading

被引:13
作者
Cunnings, Ian [1 ]
Patterson, Clare [2 ]
Felser, Claudia [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Sch Psychol & Clin Language Sci, Reading RG6 7BE, Berks, England
[2] Univ Potsdam, Potsdam Res Inst Multilingualism, Potsdam, Germany
关键词
pronoun resolution; memory retrieval; quantification; eye movements; reading; English; SENTENCE COMPREHENSION; WORKING-MEMORY; INTERFERENCE;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00840
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A number of recent studies have investigated how syntactic and non-syntactic constraints combine to cue memory retrieval during anaphora resolution. In this paper we investigate how syntactic constraints and gender congruence interact to guide memory retrieval during the resolution of subject pronouns. Subject pronouns are always technically ambiguous, and the application of syntactic constraints on their interpretation depends on properties of the antecedent that is to be retrieved. While pronouns can freely corefer with non-quantified referential antecedents, linking a pronoun to a quantified antecedent is only possible in certain syntactic configurations via variable binding. We report the results from a judgment task and three online reading comprehension experiments investigating pronoun resolution with quantified and non-quantified antecedents. Results from both the judgment task and participants' eye movements during reading indicate that comprehenders freely allow pronouns to corefer with non-quantified antecedents, but that retrieval of quantified antecedents is restricted to specific syntactic environments. We interpret our findings as indicating that syntactic constraints constitute highly weighted cues to memory retrieval during anaphora resolution.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R
[2]   Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items [J].
Baayen, R. H. ;
Davidson, D. J. ;
Bates, D. M. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 59 (04) :390-412
[3]   The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphors [J].
Badecker, W ;
Straub, K .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2002, 28 (04) :748-769
[4]   Quantificational Binding Does Not Require C-Command [J].
Barker, Chris .
LINGUISTIC INQUIRY, 2012, 43 (04) :614-633
[5]   Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal [J].
Barr, Dale J. ;
Levy, Roger ;
Scheepers, Christoph ;
Tily, Harry J. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2013, 68 (03) :255-278
[6]  
Bosch Peter., 1983, AGREEMENT ANAPHORA S
[7]  
Carminati MariaNella., 2002, J SEMANT, V19, P1, DOI [10.1093/jos/19.1.1, DOI 10.1093/JOS/19.1.1]
[8]  
Chomsky N., 1981, LECT GOVT BINDING PI
[9]   Immediate sensitivity to structural constraints in pronoun resolution [J].
Chow, Wing-Yee ;
Lewis, Shevaun ;
Phillips, Colin .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
[10]   Reflexive anaphor resolution in spoken language comprehension: structural constraints and beyond [J].
Clackson, Kaili ;
Heyer, Vera .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5