Statistical planning in confirmatory clinical trials with multiple treatment groups, multiple visits, and multiple endpoints

被引:1
作者
Sun, Hengrui [1 ]
Snyder, Ellen [2 ]
Koch, Gary G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Biostat, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Merck & Co Inc, Kenilworth, NJ USA
关键词
Closed testing; confirmatory clinical trials; multiple endpoints; multiple treatment groups; multiple visits; multiplicity; ADJUSTMENT METHODS;
D O I
10.1080/10543406.2017.1378664
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Multiplicity issues can be multidimensional: A confirmatory clinical trial may be designed to have efficacy assessed with two or more primary endpoints, for multiple dose groups, and at several post-baseline visits. Controlling for multiplicity in this situation is challenging because there can be a hierarchy with respect to some but not all measurements. If the higher dose is considered more efficacious, multiplicity approach may evaluate the higher dose with higher priority through a fixed sequential testing framework for dose assessments in combination with a Hochberg approach for endpoints. The lower dose is only assessed when the higher dose has significant results, which reduces the power for detecting signals in the lower dose group. However, in some instances the higher dose may associate with tolerability or safety concerns that preclude regulatory approval. A real confirmatory clinical trial with such challenges is provided as an illustrative example. We discuss closed testing procedures based on multi-way averages of comparisons for this complex multiplicity situation through illustrative case analyses and a simulation study. Such strategies manage the higher dose and the lower dose with equal priority, and they enable evaluation of the multiple endpoints at multiple visits collectively with power being reasonably high.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 211
页数:23
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Advanced multiplicity adjustment methods in clinical trials
    Alosh, Mohamed
    Bretz, Frank
    Huque, Mohammad
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2014, 33 (04) : 693 - 713
  • [2] Practical usage of O'Brien's OLS and GLS statistics in clinical trials
    Dallow, Nigel S.
    Leonov, Sergei L.
    Roger, James H.
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2008, 7 (01) : 53 - 68
  • [3] Gatekeeping strategies for clinical trials that do not require all primary effects to be significant
    Dmitrienko, A
    Offen, WW
    Westfall, PH
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2003, 22 (15) : 2387 - 2400
  • [4] Dmitrienko A., 2005, ANAL CLIN TRIALS USI
  • [5] Tree-structured gatekeeping tests in clinical trials with hierarchically ordered multiple objectives
    Dmitrienko, Alex
    Wiens, Brian L.
    Tamhane, Ajit C.
    Wang, Xin
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (12) : 2465 - 2478
  • [6] Traditional multiplicity adjustment methods in clinical trials
    Dmitrienko, Alex
    D'Agostino, Ralph, Sr.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 32 (29) : 5172 - 5218
  • [7] Key multiplicity issues in clinical drug development
    Dmitrienko, Alex
    D'Agostino, Ralph B., Sr.
    Huque, Mohammad F.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 32 (07) : 1079 - 1111
  • [8] FDA, 2017, GUIDANCE DOCUMENT MU
  • [9] Suvorexant in Patients with Insomnia: Pooled Analyses of Three-Month Data from Phase-3 Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials
    Herring, W. Joseph
    Connor, Kathleen M.
    Snyder, Ellen
    Snavely, Duane B.
    Zhang, Ying
    Hutzelmann, Jill
    Matzura-Wolfe, Deborah
    Benca, Ruth M.
    Krystal, Andrew D.
    Walsh, James K.
    Lines, Christopher
    Roth, Thomas
    Michelson, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SLEEP MEDICINE, 2016, 12 (09): : 1215 - 1225
  • [10] Suvorexant in Patients With Insomnia: Results From Two 3-Month Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials
    Herring, W. Joseph
    Connor, Kathryn M.
    Ivgy-May, Neely
    Snyder, Ellen
    Liu, Ken
    Snavely, Duane B.
    Krystal, Andrew D.
    Walsh, James K.
    Benca, Ruth M.
    Rosenberg, Russell
    Sangal, R. Bart
    Budd, Kerry
    Hutzelmann, Jill
    Leibensperger, Heather
    Froman, Samar
    Lines, Christopher
    Roth, Thomas
    Michelson, David
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 79 (02) : 136 - 148