Does federal disaster assistance crowd out flood insurance?

被引:94
作者
Kousky, Carolyn [1 ]
Michel-Kerjan, Erwann O. [1 ]
Raschky, Paul A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Monash Univ, Dept Econ, Clayton, Vic, Australia
关键词
Natural disasters and extreme events; Flood insurance; Disaster relief; SAMARITANS DILEMMA; UNITED-STATES; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; RISK; AID; LOSSES; MARKET; ADAPTATION; INCENTIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeem.2017.05.010
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We empirically analyze whether federal disaster aid crowds out household purchase of disaster insurance. We combine data on annual household flood insurance purchases for the United States over the period 2000-2011 with data from the two main U.S. post disaster federal aid programs (FEMA's Individual Assistance grants and SBA's low interest disaster loans). Estimating both fixed -effects and instrumental variable models to account for the endogeneity of disaster assistance grants, we find that receiving individual assistance grants decreases the average quantity of insurance purchased the following year by between $4000 and $5000. The reduction we find is roughly 3% of the mean insurance coverage in the sample but larger than the average flood-related IA grant in our sample, which is $2984. IA,is currently limited and larger grants could have different impacts. The crowding out is on the intensive margin; we find no impact on take-up rates, likely because there is a requirement that recipients of disaster aid purchase an insurance policy. We do not know how take-up rates might change without such a requirement. Low interest post-disaster government loans have no systematic effect on insurance purchases. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 164
页数:15
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Kinship, Incentives, and Evolution [J].
Alger, Ingela ;
Weibull, Jorgen W. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2010, 100 (04) :1725-1758
[2]  
Angrist JD, 2009, MOSTLY HARMLESS ECONOMETRICS: AN EMPIRICISTS COMPANION, P1
[3]  
Angrist Joshua D., 2009, LOND SCH EC UNPUB
[4]  
Asseldonk M. A. P. M. van, 2002, Review of Agricultural Economics, V24, P196, DOI 10.1111/1467-9353.00091
[5]   What drives households to buy flood insurance? New evidence from Georgia [J].
Atreya, Ajita ;
Ferreira, Susana ;
Michel-Kerjan, Erwann .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 117 :153-161
[6]   A trend analysis of normalized insured damage from natural disasters [J].
Barthel, Fabian ;
Neumayer, Eric .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2012, 113 (02) :215-237
[7]   ALTERNATIVE APPROXIMATIONS TO THE DISTRIBUTIONS OF INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE ESTIMATORS [J].
BEKKER, PA .
ECONOMETRICA, 1994, 62 (03) :657-681
[8]   How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Duflo, E ;
Mullainathan, S .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 119 (01) :249-275
[9]   Changes in implicit flood risk premiums: Empirical evidence from the housing market [J].
Bin, Okmyung ;
Landry, Craig E. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 65 (03) :361-376
[10]   Risk attitudes to low-probability climate change risks: WTP for flood insurance [J].
Botzen, W. J. W. ;
van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2012, 82 (01) :151-166