An Ensemble of Classifiers Based on Positive and Unlabeled Data in One-Class Remote Sensing Classification

被引:20
作者
Liu, Ran [1 ]
Li, Wenkai [1 ]
Liu, Xiaoping [1 ]
Lu, Xingcheng [2 ]
Li, Tianhong [3 ]
Guo, Qinghua [4 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Geog & Planning, Guangdong Prov Key Labo Urbanizat & Geosimulat, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Div Environm, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Bot, State Key Lab Vegetat & Environm Change, Beijing 100093, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Classifier ensemble; one-class classification; positive and unlabeled learning (PUL); weighted average; weighted vote; MAXIMUM-ENTROPY APPROACH; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; NEURAL-NETWORKS; MODEL; ACCURACY; ALGORITHMS; REGRESSION; DIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1109/JSTARS.2017.2789213
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
One-class remote sensing classification refers to the situations when users are only interested in one specific land type without considering other types. The positive and unlabeled learning (PUL) algorithm, which trains a binary classifier from positive and unlabeled data, has been shown to be promising in one-class classification. The implementation of PUL by a single classifier has been investigated. However, implementing PUL using multiple classifiers and creating classifier ensembles based on PUL have not been studied. In this research, we investigate the implementations of PUL using several classifiers, including generalized linear model, generalized additive model, multivariate adaptive regression splines, maximum entropy, backpropagation neural network, and support vector machine, as well as three ensemble methods based on majority vote, weighted average, and weighted vote combination rules. These methods are applied in classifying the urban areas from four remote sensing imagery of different spatial resolutions, including aerial photograph, Landsat 8, WorldView-3, and Gaofen-1. Experimental results show that classifiers can successfully extract the urban areas with high accuracies, and the ensemble methods based on weighted average and weighted vote generally outperform the individual classifiers on different datasets. We conclude that PUL is a promising method in one-class remote sensing classification, and the classifier ensemble based on PUL can significantly improve the accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:572 / 584
页数:13
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
Ahmad A., 2012, Applied Mathematical Sciences, V6, DOI [10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00311-X, DOI 10.12988/AMS.2013.34214]
[2]   Ensemble forecasting of species distributions [J].
Araujo, Miguel B. ;
New, Mark .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2007, 22 (01) :42-47
[3]   Single-Species Detection With Airborne Imaging Spectroscopy Data: A Comparison of Support Vector Techniques [J].
Baldeck, Claire A. ;
Asner, Gregory P. .
IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 8 (06) :2501-2512
[4]   An empirical comparison of voting classification algorithms: Bagging, boosting, and variants [J].
Bauer, E ;
Kohavi, R .
MACHINE LEARNING, 1999, 36 (1-2) :105-139
[5]   Who launched what, when and why; trends in global land-cover observation capacity from civilian earth observation satellites [J].
Belward, Alan S. ;
Skoien, Jon O. .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 103 :115-128
[6]   Hybrid consensus theoretic classification [J].
Benediktsson, JA ;
Sveinsson, JR ;
Swain, PH .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1997, 35 (04) :833-843
[7]  
BENEDIKTSSON JA, 1993, 1993 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS, VOLS 1-3, P27, DOI 10.1109/ICNN.1993.298536
[8]  
Benediktsson JA, 2007, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V4472, P501
[9]  
Berger AL, 1996, COMPUT LINGUIST, V22, P39
[10]   The impact of diversity on the accuracy of evidential classifier ensembles [J].
Bi, Yaxin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2012, 53 (04) :584-607