Bt cotton and employment effects for female agricultural laborers in Pakistan

被引:9
|
作者
Kouser, Shahzad [1 ]
Abedullah [2 ]
Qaim, Matin [3 ]
机构
[1] COMSATS Inst Informat Technol, Dept Management Sci, Islamabad, Pakistan
[2] Int Livestock Res Inst, Islamabad, Pakistan
[3] Georg August Univ Goettingen, Dept Agr Econ & Rural Dev, Gottingen, Germany
关键词
Bt cotton; Employment; Gender effects; Double-hurdle model; Pakistan; DOUBLE-HURDLE MODEL; SMALLHOLDER AGRICULTURE; MARKET DEVELOPMENT; FERTILIZER DEMAND; GENDER ISSUES; ADOPTION; POVERTY; IMPACT; CROPS; CHINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.nbt.2016.05.004
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The literature about economic and social impacts of Bt cotton adoption on farm households in developing countries is growing. Yet, there is still uncertainty about wider implications of this technology for rural development, including effects for landless rural laborers. Bt-related yield advantages may lead to intensified production and higher demand for labor. Building on farm survey data collected in Pakistan and using double-hurdle regression models, we analyze employment effects of Bt cotton adoption. Model estimates show that Bt adoption has increased the demand for hired labor by 55%. Manual harvesting, which is common in Pakistan, is a labor-intensive activity primarily carried out by female laborers. Accordingly, gender disaggregation shows that the employment-generating effects are particularly strong for women, who often belong to the most disadvantaged groups of rural societies. These results suggest that Bt technology can contribute to additional employment income for the poor and to more equitable rural development. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 46
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Village-wide Effects of Agricultural Biotechnology: The Case of Bt Cotton in India
    Subramanian, Arjunan
    Qaim, Matin
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 37 (01) : 256 - 267
  • [2] A Question of Integrity: Variants of Bt Cotton, Pesticides and Productivity in Pakistan
    Ma, Xingliang
    Smale, Melinda
    Spielman, David J.
    Zambrano, Patricia
    Nazli, Hina
    Zaidi, Fatima
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 68 (02) : 366 - 385
  • [3] Bt Cotton, Pesticide Use and Environmental Efficiency in Pakistan
    Abedullah
    Kouser, Shahzad
    Qaim, Matin
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 66 (01) : 66 - 86
  • [4] Valuing financial, health, and environmental benefits of Bt cotton in Pakistan
    Kouser, Shahzad
    Qaim, Matin
    AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 44 (03) : 323 - 335
  • [5] Dissemination of Bt cotton in cotton growing belt of Pakistan
    Azam, Saira
    Samiullah, Tahir Rehman
    Yasmeen, Aneela
    Din, Salah ud
    Iqbal, Adnan
    Rao, Abdul Qayyum
    Nasir, Idrees Ahmad
    Rashid, Bushra
    Shahid, Ahmad Ali
    Ahmad, Munir
    Husnain, Tayyab
    ADVANCEMENTS IN LIFE SCIENCES, 2013, 1 (01): : 18 - 26
  • [6] A decade of Bt cotton in Chinese fields: Assessing the direct effects and indirect externalities of Bt cotton adoption in China
    Huang JiKun
    Mi JianWei
    Lin Hai
    Wang ZiJun
    Chen RuiJian
    Hu RuiFa
    Rozelle, Scott
    Pray, Carl
    SCIENCE CHINA-LIFE SCIENCES, 2010, 53 (08) : 981 - 991
  • [7] State science, risk and agricultural biotechnology: Bt cotton to Bt Brinjal in India
    Herring, Ronald J.
    JOURNAL OF PEASANT STUDIES, 2015, 42 (01) : 159 - 186
  • [8] A decade of Bt cotton in Chinese fields: Assessing the direct effects and indirect externalities of Bt cotton adoption in China
    JiKun Huang
    JianWei Mi
    Hai Lin
    ZiJun Wang
    RuiJian Chen
    RuiFa Hu
    Scott Rozelle
    Carl Pray
    Science China Life Sciences, 2010, 53 : 981 - 991
  • [9] A decade of Bt cotton in Chinese fields: Assessing the direct effects and indirect externalities of Bt cotton adoption in China
    Scott ROZELLE
    Carl PRAY
    Science China(Life Sciences), 2010, (08) : 981 - 991
  • [10] Impacts of Bt cotton on profitability, productivity and farm inputs in Pakistan: use of panel models
    Bakhsh, Khuda
    ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2017, 22 (04) : 373 - 391