The diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein for sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:169
|
作者
Tan, Meichun [1 ]
Lu, Yunxia [1 ]
Jiang, Hao [1 ]
Zhang, Liandong [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Baoshan Tradit Chinese Med Integrat Hosp, Dept Emergency EICU, Shanghai 201999, Peoples R China
关键词
C-reactive protein (CRP); meta-analysis; procalcitonin; sepsis; INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE SYNDROME; PREDICTING BACTEREMIA; SEPTIC SHOCK; MORTALITY; MARKERS; ICU;
D O I
10.1002/jcb.27870
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background The objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the clinical value of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of adult patients with sepsis. Method PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Wanfang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and VIP database were searched by the index words to identify the qualified prospective studies, and relevant literature sources were also searched. The most recent research was done in the April 2017. The only languages included were English or Chinese. In the experiment group, patients were diagnosed with sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock; in the control group, the patients were of noninfectious origin or a systemic inflammatory response syndrome. The diagnostic accuracy was analyzed by heterogeneity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and the summary receiver-operating characteristic curve. Results At least nine studies were involved in the meta-analysis with 495 patients in the sepsis group and 873 patients in the nonsepsis group. In terms of the diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein (CRP) for sepsis, the overall area under the summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-0.77), with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.63-0.90) and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.50-0.72) respectively, and the DOR was 6.89 (95% CI, 3.86-12.31). In terms of the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin (PCT) for sepsis, the overall area under the SROC curve was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.82-0.88), with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.69-0.87) and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.60-0.88) respectively, and the DOR was 12.50 (95% CI, 3.65-42.80). Conclusion In this meta-analysis, our results together indicate a moderate degree of value of PCT and CRP for the diagnosis of sepsis in adult patients. The diagnosis accuracy and specificity of PCT are higher than those of CRP.
引用
收藏
页码:5852 / 5859
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of diagnostic accuracy in sepsis between presepsin, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Chin-Chieh
    Lan, Hao-Min
    Han, Shih-Tsung
    Chaou, Chung-Hsien
    Yeh, Chun-Fu
    Liu, Su-Hsun
    Li, Chih-Huang
    Blaney, Gerald N., III
    Liu, Zhen-Ying
    Chen, Kuan-Fu
    ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2017, 7
  • [2] Comparison of diagnostic accuracy in sepsis between presepsin, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chin-Chieh Wu
    Hao-Min Lan
    Shih-Tsung Han
    Chung-Hsien Chaou
    Chun-Fu Yeh
    Su-Hsun Liu
    Chih-Huang Li
    Gerald N. Blaney
    Zhen-Ying Liu
    Kuan-Fu Chen
    Annals of Intensive Care, 7
  • [3] Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Procalcitonin and C-Reactive Protein in Neonatal Sepsis: A Systematic Review
    Anugu, NagaSpurthy Reddy
    Khan, Safeera
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (11)
  • [4] Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracies of Monocyte Distribution Width, Procalcitonin, and C-Reactive Protein for Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Huang, Yu-Hsuan
    Chen, Ching-Jung
    Shao, Shih-Chieh
    Li, Chih-Huang
    Hsiao, Chien-Han
    Niu, Kuang-Yu
    Yen, Chieh-Ching
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (05) : E106 - E114
  • [5] The combination of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein or presepsin alone improves the accuracy of diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Lin Ruan
    Guan-Yu Chen
    Zhen Liu
    Yun Zhao
    Guang-Yu Xu
    Shu-Fang Li
    Chun-Ni Li
    Lin-Shan Chen
    Zheng Tao
    Critical Care, 22
  • [6] Comparison of the accuracy of neutrophil CD64, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein for sepsis identification: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yeh, Chun-Fu
    Wu, Chin-Chieh
    Liu, Su-Hsun
    Chen, Kuan-Fu
    ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [7] The combination of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein or presepsin alone improves the accuracy of diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Ruan, Lin
    Chen, Guan-Yu
    Liu, Zhen
    Zhao, Yun
    Xu, Guang-Yu
    Li, Shu-Fang
    Li, Chun-Ni
    Chen, Lin-Shan
    Tao, Zheng
    CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 22
  • [8] Comparison of the accuracy of neutrophil CD64, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein for sepsis identification: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chun-Fu Yeh
    Chin-Chieh Wu
    Su-Hsun Liu
    Kuan-Fu Chen
    Annals of Intensive Care, 9
  • [9] The Diagnostic Accuracy Of C-Reactive Protein For Active Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis
    Patel, S.
    Yoon, C.
    Chaisson, L. H.
    Drain, P.
    Cattamanchi, A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 191
  • [10] Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and white blood cell count for suspected acute appendicitis
    Yu, C. -W.
    Juan, L. -I.
    Wu, M. -H.
    Shen, C. -J.
    Wu, J. -Y.
    Lee, C. -C.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (03) : 322 - 329