A framework for the development of maternal quality of care indicators

被引:17
作者
Korst, LM
Gregory, KD
Lu, MC
Reyes, C
Hobel, CJ
Chavez, GF
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp Los Angeles, Saban Res Inst, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Div Res Children Youth & Families, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Div Neonatal Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Burns & Allen Res Inst, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[7] Univ So Calif, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[8] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[9] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Div Womens Hlth Serv Res & Policy, Los Angeles, CA USA
[10] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Los Angeles, CA USA
[11] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Community Hlth Serv, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[12] Agcy Healthcare Res & Qual, Rockville, MD USA
关键词
quality indicators; health care; maternal health services; pregnancy;
D O I
10.1007/s10995-005-0001-y
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: In collaboration with the California Department of Health Maternal and Child Health Branch, the authors formed a Working Group to identify potential clinical indicators that could be used to inform decision making regarding maternal health care quality. Objective: To develop potential indicators for the assessment of maternal health care quality. Materials and Methods: A Working Group was convened to review information from the published literature and expert opinion. Selection of potential indicators was guided by the following goals: 1) To identify key areas for routine aggregate monitoring; 2) To include perspectives of relevant stakeholders in maternal health care services 3) To include measures that are comprehensive and reflect a balance between maternal and fetal interests; and 4) To develop measures that would be valid, generalizable, mutable, and feasible. Results: Ninety potential indicators were identified. Each underwent a thorough review based on: its definition, objective, and validity; its contribution to innovation; the cost and timeliness of implementation; its feasibility, acceptability, and potential effectiveness; and its compatibility with ethics, values, and social policy. This process yielded 24 final indicators from the following categories: Health Status and Access (e.g., availability of 24 h inpatient anesthesia); Preconception and Interconception Care (e.g., Pap smear use); Antenatal Care (e.g., hospitalization for uncontrolled diabetes or pyelonephritis); Labor and Delivery Care (e.g., chorioamnionitis or obstetrical hemorrhage), and Postpartum Care (e.g., rate of postpartum visits). Conclusions: These potential indicators, representative of the women's health continuum, can serve as a foundation to structure the development of consensus and methods for maternal health care quality assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 341
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Guideline-Based Development of Quality Indicators for Hypertensive Diseases in Pregnancy
    Luitjes, Susanne H.
    Wouters, Maurice G.
    Franx, Arie
    Bolte, Antoinette C.
    de Groot, Christianne J.
    van Tulder, Maurits W.
    Hermens, Rosella P.
    HYPERTENSION IN PREGNANCY, 2013, 32 (01) : 20 - 31
  • [32] Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe definition of quality indicators for pharmaceutical care: a systematic literature review and international consensus development
    Fujita, Kenji
    Halvorsen, Kjell H.
    Sato, Noriko
    Jazbar, Janja
    Modamio, Pilar
    Waltering, Isabel
    De Wulf, Isabelle
    Westerlund, Tommy
    Chen, Timothy F.
    Teichert, Martina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2024, 46 (01) : 70 - 79
  • [33] Development of care quality indicators for palliative care in China: A modified Delphi method study
    Zheng, Hongling
    Cheng, Qinqin
    Xu, Xianghua
    Yan, Yixia
    Luo, Ge
    Gong, Youwen
    Chen, Yongyi
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2023, 10 (12)
  • [34] Development and testing of Australian prehospital care quality indicators: study protocol
    Pap, Robin
    Lockwood, Craig
    Stephenson, Matthew
    Simpson, Paul
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (07):
  • [35] A review of maternal mortality and quality of care in the USA
    Wong, Ping Chet
    Kitsantas, Panagiota
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (19) : 3355 - 3367
  • [36] Quality indicators in nursing care
    Tsouropli, Leloudenia
    SCIENTIFIC CHRONICLES, 2018, 23 : 42 - 46
  • [37] Quality indicators for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit
    Clarke, EB
    Curtis, JR
    Luce, JM
    Levy, M
    Danis, M
    Nelson, J
    Solomon, MZ
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (09) : 2255 - 2262
  • [38] Quality indicators for care of depression in primary care settings: a systematic review
    Petrosyan, Yelena
    Sahakyan, Yeva
    Barnsley, Jan M.
    Kuluski, Kerry
    Liu, Barbara
    Wodchis, Walter P.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, 6
  • [39] Quality of Care for Patients With Multiple Sclerosis - A Review of Existing Quality Indicators
    Kraft, Anna Kristina
    Berger, Klaus
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [40] Quality indicators for breast cancer care: A systematic review
    Maes-Carballo, Marta
    Gomez-Fandino, Yolanda
    Reinoso-Hermida, Ayla
    Estrada-Lopez, Carlos Roberto
    Martin-Diaz, Manuel
    Khan, Khalid Saeed
    Bueno-Cavanillas, Aurora
    BREAST, 2021, 59 : 221 - 231