Differences Among Deviations, Genders, and Observers in the Perception of Eye and Nose Asymmetry

被引:10
作者
Kwak, Kyoung-Ho [1 ]
Kim, Yong-Il [1 ,2 ]
Nam, Hyung-Jin [1 ]
Kim, Seong-Sik [1 ]
Park, Soo-Byung [1 ]
Son, Woo-Sung [1 ]
机构
[1] Pusan Natl Univ Dent Hosp, Dept Orthodont, Yangsan 626787, South Korea
[2] Pusan Natl Univ Dent Hosp, Dent Res Inst, Yangsan 626787, South Korea
关键词
FACIAL ATTRACTIVENESS; SEXUAL SELECTION; SYMMETRY; AVERAGENESS; ALWAYS; IMPACT; FACES;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2015.02.009
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study investigated the degree and range of recognition of canting of the interpupillary line and deviation of the nose, which were regarded as "normal,'' "acceptable,'' and "needing surgical correction,'' according to different observer groups. Materials and Methods: Four different groups (40 each for laypeople, dental students, general dentists, and orthodontists) rated 11 simulated asymmetric images with canted eyes and a deviated nose separately. The raters categorized each image as normal, socially "acceptable'' and not requiring correction, or abnormal and would benefit from correction. Survival analysis was used to evaluate the scope of perception. Results: The degree of recognition for eye-canting and nose deviation was 2.31 and 2.92, respectively. Eye-canting and nose deviation had lower degrees of recognition in the clockwise direction (2.13 degrees) and on the left side (2.65 degrees), respectively. Women showed a lower degree of the "upper limit of the acceptable range'' for canted eyes, and men showed a lower "degree of recognition'' and "upper limit of the acceptable range'' for a deviated nose. Orthodontists showed a larger upper limit of the acceptable range for eye-canting (P< .001). Conclusions: The perceptions of asymmetry of canted eyes and deviated nose were affected by gender, direction of asymmetry, and observer groups. (C) 2015 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:1606 / 1614
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [11] Epker BN., 1986, Dentofacial deformities, pint
  • [12] Erickson K., 1992, Modern practice in orthognathic and reconstructive surgery, P156
  • [13] International anthropometric study of facial morphology in various ethnic groups/races
    Farkas, LG
    Katic, MJ
    Forrest, CR
    Alt, KW
    Bagic, I
    Baltadjiev, G
    Cunha, E
    Cvicelova, M
    Davies, S
    Erasmus, I
    Gillett-Netting, R
    Hajnis, K
    Kemkes-Grottenthaler, A
    Khomyakova, I
    Kumi, A
    Kgamphe, JS
    Kayo-Daigo, N
    Le, T
    Malinowski, A
    Negasheva, M
    Manolis, S
    Ogetürk, M
    Parvizrad, R
    Rösing, F
    Sahu, P
    Sforza, C
    Sivkov, S
    Sultanova, N
    Tomazo-Ravnik, T
    Tóth, G
    Uzun, A
    Yahia, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 16 (04) : 615 - 646
  • [14] HUMAN (HOMO-SAPIENS) FACIAL ATTRACTIVENESS AND SEXUAL SELECTION - THE ROLE OF SYMMETRY AND AVERAGENESS
    GRAMMER, K
    THORNHILL, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 108 (03) : 233 - 242
  • [15] The ideal of facial beauty: A review
    Hönn M.
    Göz G.
    [J]. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 2007, 68 (1): : 6 - 16
  • [16] Hooda Shivani, 2012, J Indian Prosthodont Soc, V12, P8, DOI 10.1007/s13191-011-0087-4
  • [17] The role of symmetry in attraction to average faces
    Jones, Benedict C.
    DeBruine, Lisa M.
    Little, Anthony C.
    [J]. PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2007, 69 (08): : 1273 - 1277
  • [19] The Deviated Nose and Asymmetric Eyebrows: An Important Trap to Avoid
    Katira, Kristopher
    Guyuron, Bahman
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 133 (03) : 519 - 523
  • [20] Averageness or symmetry: Which is more important for facial attractiveness?
    Komori, Masashi
    Kawamura, Satoru
    Ishihara, Shigekazu
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2009, 131 (02) : 136 - 142