Assessment of national -level progress towards elements of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets

被引:46
作者
Buchanan, Graeme M. [1 ]
Butchart, Stuart H. M. [2 ,3 ]
Chandler, Georgina [4 ]
Gregory, Richard D. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] RSPB, Ctr Conservat Sci, 2 Lochside View, Edinburgh EH12 9DH, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] BirdLife Int, David Attenborough Bldg,Pembroke St, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Zool, Downing St, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, England
[4] RSPB, Sandy SG19 2DL, Beds, England
[5] RSPB, Ctr Conservat Sci, Sandy SG19 2DL, Beds, England
[6] UCL, Ctr Biodivers & Environm Res, London WC1H 0AG, England
关键词
CBD; Aichi Targets; Indicators; post-2020; agenda; Monitoring; GOVERNANCE; FOREST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106497
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Progress towards the Aichi Targets adopted through the Convention on Biological Diversity has been measured globally via indicators linked to elements of targets (the 20 targets consist of 54 elements), and nationally based on reporting by parties to the convention in the 5th (20102014) and 6th (20142018) National Reports. Here we used selected indicators that are readily available for each country to score national level progress (moving towards the target, little or no progress, or moving away from target) for 11 elements of eight Aichi Targets (1, 4, 5, 7, 11, 12, 19, 20). Across the selected indicators, elements, and countries for which data were available, in 24.2% of cases countries were moving towards the elements, for 22.3% they were moving away, and for 53.5% there was little or no progress. This overall level of progress is similar to progress to targets as reported in the 5th and 6th National Reports. National progress to three of the 11 elements was positively correlated with progress to targets reported in the 5th National Reports, while progress to none of the elements was correlated with progress reported in the 6th National Reports. Progress to many of the elements considered was positively correlated with better governance, and to a lesser extent GDP per capita, population density and urbanisation. We suggest that post-2020 biodiversity targets should be designed taking greater account of their measurability, and will require improved biodiversity monitoring, both of which would facilitate more effective assessment of progress and enable more insightful policy responses.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] "As Far as Possible and as Appropriate": Implementing the Aichi Biodiversity Targets
    Hagerman, Shannon M.
    Pelai, Ricardo
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2016, 9 (06): : 469 - 478
  • [2] CBD's Global Biodiversity Outlook 5: Final Assessment of Aichi Biodiversity Targets and Beyond
    Kumar, Amit
    ASIAN BIOTECHNOLOGY AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 2020, 22 (2-3): : 5 - 20
  • [3] Remote sensing for biodiversity monitoring: a review of methods for biodiversity indicator extraction and assessment of progress towards international targets
    Zisis I. Petrou
    Ioannis Manakos
    Tania Stathaki
    Biodiversity and Conservation, 2015, 24 : 2333 - 2363
  • [4] Remote sensing for biodiversity monitoring: a review of methods for biodiversity indicator extraction and assessment of progress towards international targets
    Petrou, Zisis I.
    Manakos, Ioannis
    Stathaki, Tania
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2015, 24 (10) : 2333 - 2363
  • [5] Formulating Smart Commitments on Biodiversity: Lessons from the Aichi Targets
    Butchart, Stuart H. M.
    Di Marco, Moreno
    Watson, James E. M.
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2016, 9 (06): : 457 - 468
  • [6] A new composite indicator to assess and monitor performance and drawbacks of the implementation of Aichi Biodiversity Targets
    de Castro-Pardo, Monica
    Martin Martin, Jose Maria
    Azevedo, Joao C.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 201
  • [7] Review of the Implementation of Aichi Biodiversity Targets with Special Reference to Inland, Coastal and Marine Fisheries Sectors
    Jacob, C. Thomson
    Yadava, Yugraj Singh
    Lal, Kuldeep Kumar
    ASIAN BIOTECHNOLOGY AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 2021, 23 (02): : 89 - 108
  • [8] Sufficiency and Suitability of Global Biodiversity Indicators for Monitoring Progress to 2020 Targets
    Mcowen, Chris J.
    Ivory, Sarah
    Dixon, Matthew J. R.
    Regan, Eugenie C.
    Obrecht, Andreas
    Tittensor, Derek P.
    Teller, Anne
    Chenery, Anna M.
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2016, 9 (06): : 489 - 494
  • [9] Global marine biodiversity in the context of achieving the Aichi Targets: ways forward and addressing data gaps
    Saeedi, Hanieh
    Reimer, James Davis
    Brandt, Miriam, I
    Dumais, Philippe-Olivier
    Jazdzewska, Anna Maria
    Jeffery, Nicholas W.
    Thielen, Peter M.
    Costello, Mark John
    PEERJ, 2019, 7
  • [10] A social-ecological systems analysis of impediments to delivery of the Aichi 2020 Targets and potentially more effective pathways to the conservation of biodiversity
    Hill, R.
    Dyer, G. A.
    Lozada-Ellison, L. -M.
    Gimona, A.
    Martin-Ortega, J.
    Munoz-Rojas, J.
    Gordon, I. J.
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2015, 34 : 22 - 34