Assessment of national -level progress towards elements of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets

被引:50
作者
Buchanan, Graeme M. [1 ]
Butchart, Stuart H. M. [2 ,3 ]
Chandler, Georgina [4 ]
Gregory, Richard D. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] RSPB, Ctr Conservat Sci, 2 Lochside View, Edinburgh EH12 9DH, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] BirdLife Int, David Attenborough Bldg,Pembroke St, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Zool, Downing St, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, England
[4] RSPB, Sandy SG19 2DL, Beds, England
[5] RSPB, Ctr Conservat Sci, Sandy SG19 2DL, Beds, England
[6] UCL, Ctr Biodivers & Environm Res, London WC1H 0AG, England
关键词
CBD; Aichi Targets; Indicators; post-2020; agenda; Monitoring; GOVERNANCE; FOREST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106497
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Progress towards the Aichi Targets adopted through the Convention on Biological Diversity has been measured globally via indicators linked to elements of targets (the 20 targets consist of 54 elements), and nationally based on reporting by parties to the convention in the 5th (20102014) and 6th (20142018) National Reports. Here we used selected indicators that are readily available for each country to score national level progress (moving towards the target, little or no progress, or moving away from target) for 11 elements of eight Aichi Targets (1, 4, 5, 7, 11, 12, 19, 20). Across the selected indicators, elements, and countries for which data were available, in 24.2% of cases countries were moving towards the elements, for 22.3% they were moving away, and for 53.5% there was little or no progress. This overall level of progress is similar to progress to targets as reported in the 5th and 6th National Reports. National progress to three of the 11 elements was positively correlated with progress to targets reported in the 5th National Reports, while progress to none of the elements was correlated with progress reported in the 6th National Reports. Progress to many of the elements considered was positively correlated with better governance, and to a lesser extent GDP per capita, population density and urbanisation. We suggest that post-2020 biodiversity targets should be designed taking greater account of their measurability, and will require improved biodiversity monitoring, both of which would facilitate more effective assessment of progress and enable more insightful policy responses.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, DOI DOI 10.1007/B97636
[2]   Prevent perverse outcomes from global protected area policy [J].
Barnes, Megan D. ;
Glew, Louise ;
Wyborn, Carina ;
Craigie, Ian D. .
NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2018, 2 (05) :759-762
[3]   Wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio-economic metrics and body size [J].
Barnes, Megan D. ;
Craigie, Ian D. ;
Harrison, Luke B. ;
Geldmann, Jonas ;
Collen, Ben ;
Whitmee, Sarah ;
Balmford, Andrew ;
Burgess, Neil D. ;
Brooks, Thomas ;
Hockings, Marc ;
Woodley, Stephen .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2016, 7
[4]  
Barton K., 2018, Package MuMIn
[5]  
Baynham-Herd Z, 2018, ENVIRON CONSERV, V45, P407, DOI [10.1017/S037689291700056X, 10.1017/s037689291700056x]
[7]   Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity [J].
Bruner, AG ;
Gullison, RE ;
Rice, RE ;
da Fonseca, GAB .
SCIENCE, 2001, 291 (5501) :125-128
[8]  
Butchart SH, 2019, GLOBAL ASSESSMENT RE, DOI [10.5281/zenodo.3832053, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.3832053]
[9]  
CBD, 2016, AN TARG EST PART PRO
[10]  
Chamberlain S., 2017, Package "rgbif