A Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled, Pilot Study to Assess the Effects of the Concomitant Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation with the Computer Assisted Cognitive Rehabilitation to the Prefrontal Cortex on Cognitive Functions in Patients with Stroke

被引:44
作者
Park, See-Hyun [1 ]
Koh, Eun-Jeong [2 ]
Choi, Ha-Young [2 ]
Ko, Myoung-Hwan [1 ]
机构
[1] Chonbuk Natl Univ, Biomed Res Inst, Chonbuk Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil,Med Sch,Res Inst Clin Med, Jeonju 561756, South Korea
[2] Chonbuk Natl Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurosurg, Jeonju 561756, South Korea
关键词
Transcranial direct current stimulation; Brain polarization; Cognitive function; Prefrontal cortex; Computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation; WORKING-MEMORY; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; ATTENTION; IMPAIRMENT; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.3340/jkns.2013.54.6.484
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective : To examine the synergistic effects of both computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation (CACR) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cognitive function in patients with stroke. Methods : The current double-blind, sham-controlled study enrolled a total of 11 patients who were newly diagnosed with stroke. The patients of the tDCS group (n=6) completed sessions of the Korean computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation program five times a week for 30 minutes a session during a mean period of 18.5 days concomitantly with the anodal tDCS over the bilateral prefrontal cortex combined with the CACR. The patients of the control group (n=5) also completed sessions of the sham stimulation during a mean period of 17.8 days. Anodal tDCS over bilateral prefrontal cortex (F3 and F4 in 10-20 EEG system) was delivered for 30 minutes at an intensity of 2 mA. Cathode electrodes were applied to the non-dominant arm. All the patients were evaluated using the Seoul Computerized Neuropsychological Test (SCNT) and the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination. Results : Mann-Whitney U test revealed a significant difference between the two groups. The patients of the tDCS group achieved a significant improvement in the post/pre ratio of auditory continuous performance test and visual continuous performance test on the SCNT items. Conclusion : Our results indicate that the concomitant use of the tDCS with CACR to the prefrontal cortex may provide additional beneficial effects in improving the cognitive dysfunction for patients with stroke.
引用
收藏
页码:484 / 488
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Reducing Craving, Depression, and Improving Working Memory in Patients with Cannabis Use Disorders: A Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled
    Saberi-Zafarghandi, Mohammad Bagher
    Arezoomandan, Reza
    Fayazfeyzi, Yasha
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2024, 18 (03)
  • [22] A Pilot Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Cognitive Training Combined with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment
    Martin, Donel M.
    Mohan, Adith
    Alonzo, Angelo
    Gates, Nicola
    Gbadeyan, Oyetunde
    Meinzer, Marcus
    Sachdev, Perminder
    Brodaty, Henry
    Loo, Colleen
    JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2019, 71 (02) : 503 - 512
  • [23] Efficiency of Repetitive Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Disorders of Consciousness: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Study
    Wu, Min
    Yu, Yamei
    Luo, Lunjie
    Wu, Yuehao
    Gao, Jian
    Ye, Xiangming
    Luo, Benyan
    NEURAL PLASTICITY, 2019, 2019
  • [24] Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation along with cognitive training on cognitive functions and activities of daily living in patients with Parkinson's disease: A pilot randomized controlled trial
    Saeidi, Elahe
    Rostami, Hamid Reza
    Vahedi, Mohsen
    Haghgoo, Hojjat Allah
    NEUROLOGY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2025, 13 (01): : 29 - 36
  • [25] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Naming Reaction Time in Fluent Aphasia A Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Study
    Fridriksson, Julius
    Richardson, Jessica D.
    Baker, Julie M.
    Rorden, Chris
    STROKE, 2011, 42 (03) : 819 - 821
  • [26] Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial
    Maas, Roderick P. P. W. M.
    Teerenstra, Steven
    Toni, Ivan
    Klockgether, Thomas
    Schutter, Dennis J. L. G.
    van de Warrenburg, Bart P. C.
    NEUROTHERAPEUTICS, 2022, 19 (04) : 1259 - 1272
  • [27] A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
    Cosmo, Camila
    Baptista, Abrahao Fontes
    de Araujo, Arao Nogueira
    do Rosario, Raphael Silva
    Vivas Miranda, Jose Garcia
    Montoya, Pedro
    de Sena, Eduardo Ponde
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08):
  • [28] Differential effects of primary motor cortex and cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning in healthy individuals: A randomized double-blind sham-controlled study
    Ehsani, F.
    Bakhtiary, A. H.
    Jaberzadeh, S.
    Talimkhani, A.
    Hajihasani, A.
    NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2016, 112 : 10 - 19
  • [29] Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Different Electrode Sites on the Activity of the Upper Extremity in Chronic Stroke Patients: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial
    Choi, Yong-won
    Nam, Seung-min
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETICS, 2020, 25 (03) : 396 - 401
  • [30] Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Pain and Physical Functions in Individuals with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Double-Blind Randomized Sham-controlled Study
    Is, Enes Efe
    Aksu, Serkan
    Karamursel, Sacit
    Ketenci, Aysegul
    Sindel, Dilsad
    ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA, 2023, 237 : 63 - 63