Contextual Debiasing and Critical Thinking: Reasons for Optimism

被引:9
作者
Correia, Vasco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nova Lisboa, Nova Inst Philosophy, IFILNOVA, ArgLab, Ave Berna 26,4 Piso, P-1069061 Lisbon, Portugal
来源
TOPOI-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY | 2018年 / 37卷 / 01期
关键词
Biases; Contextualism; Critical thinking; Debiasing; Meliorism; Rationality; JUDGMENT; PRECIS; ACCESSIBILITY; PERSPECTIVE; EXPLANATION; IMPEDIMENTS; ERRORS; BIAS;
D O I
10.1007/s11245-016-9388-x
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
In this article I argue that most biases in argumentation and decision-making can and should be counteracted. Although biases can prove beneficial in certain contexts, I contend that they are generally maladaptive and need correction. Yet critical thinking alone seems insufficient to mitigate biases in everyday contexts. I develop a contextualist approach, according to which cognitive debiasing strategies need to be supplemented by extra-psychic devices that rely on social and environmental constraints in order to promote rational reasoning. Finally, I examine several examples of contextual debiasing strategies and show how they can contribute to enhance critical thinking at a cognitive level.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 111
页数:9
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Virtue in Argument [J].
Aberdein, Andrew .
ARGUMENTATION, 2010, 24 (02) :165-179
[2]   Precis of breakdown of will [J].
Ainslie, G .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2005, 28 (05) :635-+
[3]   EFFECTS OF EXPLANATION AND COUNTER-EXPLANATION ON THE DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF SOCIAL THEORIES [J].
ANDERSON, CA ;
SECHLER, ES .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 50 (01) :24-34
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, NUDGE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Rules for reasoning
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1990, NUTS BOLTS SOCIAL SC
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Rationality for mortals: how people cope with uncertainty
[8]  
[Anonymous], THE ROBOTS REBELLION
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2011, RATIONALITY REFLECTI, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195341140.003.0002
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2002, BOUNDED RATIONALITY