Graft Rejection Prediction Following Kidney Transplantation Using Machine Learning Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:10
作者
Nursetyo, Aldilas Achmad [1 ,2 ]
Syed-Abdul, Shabbir [1 ,2 ]
Uddin, Mohy [3 ]
Li, Yu-Chuan [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Taipei Med Univ, Coll Med Sci & Technol, Grad Inst Biomed Informat, 15F,172-1,Sec 2,Keelung Rd, Taipei 10675, Taiwan
[2] Taipei Med Univ, Int Ctr Hlth Informat Technol, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] King Saud bin Abdulaziz Univ Hlth Sci, King Abdullah Int Med Res Ctr, Kingdom Saudi Arabia, Minist Natl Guard Hlth Affairs,Execut Off, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[4] Taipei Med Univ, Res Ctr Canc Translat Med, Taipei, Taiwan
来源
MEDINFO 2019: HEALTH AND WELLBEING E-NETWORKS FOR ALL | 2019年 / 264卷
关键词
Kidney Transplantation; Graft Rejection; Machine Learning; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; CLASSIFICATION; RECIPIENTS; SURVIVAL; MODELS;
D O I
10.3233/SHTI190173
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Kidney transplantation is recommended for patients with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). However, complications, such as graft rejection are hard to predict due to donor and recipient variability. This study discusses the role of machine learning (ML) in predicting graft rejection following kidney transplantation, by reviewing the available related literature. PubMed, DBLP, and Scopus databases were searched to identify studies that utilized ML methods, in predicting outcome following kidney transplants. Fourteen studies were included. This study reviewed the deployment of ML in 109,317 kidney transplant patients from 14 studies. We extracted five different ML algorithms from reviewed studies. Decision Tree (DT) algorithms revealed slightly higher performance with overall mean Area Under the Curve (AUC) for DT (79.5% +/- 0.06) was higher than Artificial Neural Network (ANN) (78.2% +/- 0.08). For predicting graft rejection, ANN and DT were at the top among ML models that had higher accuracy and AUC.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 14
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] A Survey of Evolutionary Algorithms for Decision-Tree Induction
    Barros, Rodrigo Coelho
    Basgalupp, Marcio Porto
    de Carvalho, Andre C. P. L. F.
    Freitas, Alex A.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART C-APPLICATIONS AND REVIEWS, 2012, 42 (03): : 291 - 312
  • [2] Bayesian Modeling of Pretransplant Variables Accurately Predicts Kidney Graft Survival
    Brown, Trevor S.
    Elster, Eric A.
    Stevens, Kristin
    Graybill, J. Christopher
    Gillern, Suzanne
    Phinney, Samuel
    Salifu, Moro O.
    Jindal, Rahul M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY, 2012, 36 (06) : 561 - 569
  • [3] Antibody-mediated renal allograft rejection: Diagnosis and pathogenesis
    Colvin, Robert B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2007, 18 (04): : 1046 - 1056
  • [4] ESTEBAN C, 2016, PREDICTING CLIN EVEN, P93, DOI DOI 10.1109/ICHI.2016.16
  • [5] The USRDS: What You Need to Know about What It Can and Can't Tell Us about ESRD
    Foley, Robert N.
    Collins, Allan J.
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2013, 8 (05): : 845 - 851
  • [6] Garcia GG, 2012, NEPHROL THER, V8, P69, DOI [10.4103/0971-4065.97101, 10.1016/j.nephro.2012.01.003, 10.5812/nephropathol.7448]
  • [7] Artificial neural networks (the multilayer perceptron) - A review of applications in the atmospheric sciences
    Gardner, MW
    Dorling, SR
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1998, 32 (14-15) : 2627 - 2636
  • [8] Graves A, 2013, INT CONF ACOUST SPEE, P6645, DOI 10.1109/ICASSP.2013.6638947
  • [9] Decisional Trees in Renal Transplant Follow-up
    Greco, R.
    Papalia, T.
    Lofaro, D.
    Maestripieri, S.
    Mancuso, D.
    Bonofiglio, R.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2010, 42 (04) : 1134 - 1136
  • [10] Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Renal Transplantation: Classification of Nephrotoxicity and Acute Cellular Rejection Episodes
    Hummel, A. D.
    Maciel, R. F.
    Rodrigues, R. G. S.
    Pisa, I. T.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2010, 42 (02) : 471 - 472