Sensitivity to reinforcer delay predicts ethanol's suppressant effects, but itself is unaffected by ethanol

被引:3
作者
Moschak, Travis M. [1 ]
Mitchell, Suzanne H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR 97239 USA
关键词
Impulsivity; Ethanol; Intertemporal choice; Delay discounting; Low level of response to alcohol; SPONTANEOUS MOTOR-ACTIVITY; IMPULSE CONTROL; ALCOHOL-CONSUMPTION; LOW-LEVEL; RATS; BEHAVIOR; CHOICE; LINES; DRINKING; QUANTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.07.009
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Relative preference for smaller, sooner rewards over larger, later rewards ("delay discounting") is increased by acute ethanol. Additionally, drug-naive levels of delay discounting can predict subsequent ethanol consumption. However, it is unknown whether these phenomena are driven by a difference in sensitivity to the reinforcer delay or a difference in sensitivity to the reinforcer magnitude, because typical delay discounting tasks manipulate both parameters simultaneously. Methods: To disambiguate these factors, two tasks were developed in which animals chose between levers with either different delay contingencies (adjusting delay task) or different magnitude contingencies (adjusting magnitude task). When task performance was stable, rats received ethanol (0, 0.6, and 0.9 g/kg, i.p.). Results: Ethanol did not affect sensitivity to delay or sensitivity to magnitude. However, responding was suppressed at the highest dose of ethanol (0.9 g/kg). Less suppression was found in animals exhibiting high levels of drug-naive sensitivity to delay. Conclusion: Thus, this study suggests that ethanol's effect on standard delay discounting tasks is not due to an alteration in sensitivity to delay or magnitude. Additionally, these data show that animals with high sensitivity to delay are resistant to the behaviorally suppressant effects of ethanol, which suggests that low tolerance for delayed rewards and low sensitivity to the behaviorally suppressant effects of ethanol may partly be driven by the same underlying mechanism. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 28
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   In vivo quantification of ethanol kinetics in rat brain [J].
Adalsteinsson, Elfar ;
Sullivan, Edith V. ;
Mayer, Dirk ;
Pfefferbaum, Adolf .
NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 31 (12) :2683-2691
[2]   Alcohol stimulates motor activity in selectively bred Sardinian alcohol-preferring (sP), but not in Sardinian alcohol-nonpreferring (sNP), rats [J].
Agabio, R ;
Carai, MAM ;
Lobina, C ;
Pani, M ;
Reali, R ;
Vacca, G ;
Gessa, GL ;
Colombo, G .
ALCOHOL, 2001, 23 (02) :123-126
[3]   SPECIOUS REWARD - BEHAVIORAL THEORY OF IMPULSIVENESS AND IMPULSE CONTROL [J].
AINSLIE, G .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1975, 82 (04) :463-496
[4]   Choice between reinforcer delays versus choice between reinforcer magnitudes: Differential Fos expression in the orbital prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens core [J].
Araujo, S. da Costa ;
Body, S. ;
Torres, L. Valencia ;
Sanchez, C. M. Olarte ;
Bak, V. K. ;
Deakin, J. F. W. ;
Anderson, I. M. ;
Bradshaw, C. M. ;
Szabadi, E. .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2010, 213 (02) :269-277
[5]   Impulsivity in abstinent alcohol-dependent patients: relation to control subjects and type 1-/type 2-like traits [J].
Bjork, JM ;
Hommer, DW ;
Grant, SJ ;
Danube, C .
ALCOHOL, 2004, 34 (2-3) :133-150
[6]   Neural systems implicated in delayed and probabilistic reinforcement [J].
Cardinal, Rudolf N. .
NEURAL NETWORKS, 2006, 19 (08) :1277-1301
[7]   Human and laboratory rodent low response to alcohol: is better consilience possible? [J].
Crabbe, John C. ;
Bell, Richard L. ;
Ehlers, Cindy L. .
ADDICTION BIOLOGY, 2010, 15 (02) :125-144
[8]   Poor impulse control predicts inelastic demand for nicotine but not alcohol in rats [J].
Diergaarde, Leontien ;
van Mourik, Yvar ;
Pattij, Tommy ;
Schoffelmeer, Anton N. M. ;
De Vries, Taco J. .
ADDICTION BIOLOGY, 2012, 17 (03) :576-587
[9]   A test of alcohol dose effects on multiple behavioral measures of impulsivity [J].
Dougherty, Donald M. ;
Marsh-Richard, Dawn M. ;
Hatzis, Erin S. ;
Nouvion, Sylvain O. ;
Mathias, Charles W. .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2008, 96 (1-2) :111-120
[10]   ETHANOL-AMPHETAMINE INTERACTION EFFECTS ON SPONTANEOUS MOTOR-ACTIVITY AND FIXED-INTERVAL RESPONDING [J].
DUNCAN, PM ;
COOK, NJ .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1981, 74 (03) :256-259