Extended-object reconstruction in adaptive-optics imaging: the multiresolution approach

被引:4
作者
Bacna Galle, R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Nuncz, J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gladysz, S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, IEEC, Dept Astron & Meteorol, Barcelona 08025, Spain
[2] Univ Barcelona, IEEC, ICC, Barcelona 08025, Spain
[3] Reial Acad Ciencies & Arts Barcelona, Obser Fabra, Barcelona 08002, Spain
[4] Fraunhofer Inst Optron Syst Tech & Bildauswertung, D-76275 Ettlingen, Germany
关键词
instrumentation: adaptive optics; techniques: image processing; methods: miscellaneous; MULTIFRAME BLIND DECONVOLUTION; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATOR; NOISE SUPPRESSION; ASTRONOMICAL IMAGES; WAVELET TRANSFORM; RESTORATION; PERFORMANCE; RESOLUTION; ALGORITHM; REPRESENTATION;
D O I
10.1051/0004-6361/201219489
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Aims. We propose the application of multiresolution transforms, such as wavelets and curvelets, to reconstruct images of extended objects that have been acquired with adaptive-optics (AO) systems. Such multichannel approaches normally make use of probabilistic tools to distinguish significant structures from noise and reconstruction residuals. We aim to check the prevailing assumption that image-reconstruction algorithms using static point spread functions (PSF) are not suitable for AO imaging. Methods. We convolved two images, one of Saturn and one of galaxy M100, taken with the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) with AO PSFs from the 5-m Hale telescope at the Palomar Observatory and added shot and readout noise. Subsequently, we applied different approaches to the blurred and noisy data to recover the original object. The approaches included multiframe blind deconvolution (with the algorithm IDAC), myopic deconvolution with regularization (with MISTRAL) and wavelet- or curvelet-based static PSF deconvolution (AWMLE and ACMLE algorithms). We used the mean squared error (MSE) to compare the results. Results. We found that multichannel deconvolution with a static PSF produces generally better results than the results obtained with the myopic/blind approaches (for the images we tested), thus showing that the ability of a method to suppress the noise and track the underlying iterative process is just as critical as the capability of the myopic/blind approaches to update the PSF. Furthermore, for these images, the curvelet transform (CT) produces better results than the wavelet transform (WT), as measured in terms of MSE.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 57 条
[11]   Analysis of isoplanatic high resolution stellar fields by the StarFinder code [J].
Diolaiti, E ;
Bendinelli, O ;
Bonaccini, D ;
Close, L ;
Currie, D ;
Parmeggiani, G .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 2000, 147 (02) :335-346
[12]   Photometry with adaptive optics: A first guide to expected performance [J].
Esslinger, O ;
Edmunds, MG .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 1998, 129 (03) :617-635
[13]  
FADILI MJ, 2006, SPARSE REPRESENTATIO
[14]  
Frieden B, 1978, IMAGE ENHANCE MENT R
[15]  
Gladysz S, 2010, P AMOS TECH C, pE24
[16]  
Gonzalez Audicana M, 2005, INT J REMOTE SWNS, V26, P595
[17]   BAYESIAN RECONSTRUCTIONS FROM EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY DATA USING A MODIFIED EM ALGORITHM [J].
GREEN, PJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1990, 9 (01) :84-93
[18]   Optimally sparse multidimensional representation using shearlets [J].
Guo, Kanghui ;
Labate, Demetrio .
SIAM JOURNAL ON MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS, 2007, 39 (01) :298-318
[19]   PHARO: A near-infrared camera for the Palomar Adaptive Optics System [J].
Hayward, TL ;
Brandl, B ;
Pirger, B ;
Blacken, C ;
Gull, GE ;
Schoenwald, J ;
Houck, JR .
PUBLICATIONS OF THE ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF THE PACIFIC, 2001, 113 (779) :105-118
[20]   Adaptive optics observations of asteroid (216) Kleopatra [J].
Hestroffer, D ;
Marchis, F ;
Fusco, T ;
Berthier, J .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2002, 394 (01) :339-343