The Comprehension Problems of Children With Poor Reading Comprehension Despite Adequate Decoding: A Meta-Analysis

被引:44
作者
Spencer, Mercedes [1 ,2 ]
Wagner, Richard K. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, PMB 40,230 Appleton Pl, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Kennedy Ctr, PMB 40,230 Appleton Pl, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[3] Florida State Univ, Psychol, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[4] Florida State Univ, Florida Ctr Reading Res, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
关键词
systematic review; meta-analysis; reading comprehension; poor comprehenders; oral language; LESS-SKILLED COMPREHENDERS; ROBUST VARIANCE-ESTIMATION; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; WORKING-MEMORY; LANGUAGE-SKILLS; PHONOLOGICAL SKILLS; SYNTACTIC AWARENESS; TEXT COMPREHENSION; ANAPHORIC DEVICES; WORD MEANINGS;
D O I
10.3102/0034654317749187
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this meta-analysis was to examine the comprehension problems of children who have a specific reading comprehension deficit (SCD), which is characterized by poor reading comprehension despite adequate decoding. The meta-analysis included 86 studies of children with SCD who were assessed in reading comprehension and oral language (vocabulary, listening comprehension, storytelling ability, and semantic and syntactic knowledge). Results indicated that children with SCD had deficits in oral language (d = -0.78, 95% confidence interval, CI [-0.89, -0.68], but these deficits were not as severe as their deficit in reading comprehension (d = -2.78, 95% CI [-3.01, -2.54]). When compared with reading comprehension age-matched normal readers, the oral language skills of the two groups were comparable (d = 0.32, 95% CI [-0.49, 1.14]), which suggests that the oral language weaknesses of children with SCD represent a developmental delay rather than developmental deviance. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:366 / 400
页数:35
相关论文
共 178 条
[1]   Not all reading disabilities are alike [J].
Aaron, PG ;
Joshi, M ;
Williams, KA .
JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 1999, 32 (02) :120-137
[2]   ON THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SPOKEN AND WRITTEN LANGUAGE [J].
AKINNASO, FN .
LANGUAGE AND SPEECH, 1982, 25 (MAR-) :97-125
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, DEV EARL LIT REP NAT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidencebased assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1977, SCRIPTS PLANS GOALS
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, ROBUMETA ROBUST VARI
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2010, MICR EXC COMP SOFTW
[8]   EFFECTS OF LONG-TERM VOCABULARY INSTRUCTION ON LEXICAL ACCESS AND READING-COMPREHENSION [J].
BECK, IL ;
PERFETTI, CA ;
MCKEOWN, MG .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 74 (04) :506-521
[9]  
Bishop D.V.M, 2014, LANGUAGE LITER UNPUB
[10]   A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPECIFIC LANGUAGE IMPAIRMENT, PHONOLOGICAL DISORDERS AND READING RETARDATION [J].
BISHOP, DVM ;
ADAMS, C .
JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY AND ALLIED DISCIPLINES, 1990, 31 (07) :1027-1050