The Fusion of Constructivism and Instructivism in Chinese Kindergartens: An Analysis of the Teaching Dialogues in the Engineer Block Building Activities

被引:5
作者
Cai, Liman [1 ]
Wu, Dandan [2 ]
Chen, Xi [3 ]
Zhu, Jie [4 ]
Li, Hui [2 ]
机构
[1] South China Normal Univ, Sch Educ, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Macquarie Univ, Sch Educ, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Jiulong Ctr Kindergarten, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Educ, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
HONG-KONG; PEDAGOGY; SHENZHEN;
D O I
10.1080/10409289.2020.1812936
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Research findings This study aimed to explore whether the fusion of constructivism and instructivism could be observed in the teaching dialogs during the Engineer Block Building (EBB) activities in Chinese kindergartens. Altogether 20 block building activities about the theme of architecture were videotaped and coded with theEngineer Design Process(EDP) framework and theCam-UNAM Scheme for Educational Dialogue Analysis (SEDA). Analysis of the 5808 coded turns of dialogs found that: (1) all the six EDP phases could be observed in the 20 activities, which could be regarded as EBB; (2) all the SEDA types were adopted by the 15 Chinese teachers, who endeavored to deliver EBB knowledge and skills; (3) the teachers from high ranking or public kindergartens employed significantly moreTryandDecideprocesses of EDP than those from no-ranking or private kindergartens; and (4) the top three types of SEDA employed by the teachers were"invite opinions or ideas", "propose action or inquiry activity", and "state agreement or position". These results jointly indicated that the fusion of pedagogies was also dominant in Chinese EBB activities.Practice or Policy: More culturally and contextually appropriate guidance and training on EBB and EDP should be provided to enhance early childhood teachers' professionalism and professional development.
引用
收藏
页码:1033 / 1052
页数:20
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Adams R., 2011, Journal of Engineering Education, V100, P1
[2]   Practicing engineering while building with blocks: identifying engineering thinking [J].
Bagiati, Aikaterini ;
Evangelou, Demetra .
EUROPEAN EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2016, 24 (01) :67-85
[3]  
Bairaktarova D., 2011, CHILDREN YOUTH ENV, V21, P212, DOI DOI 10.1353/CYE.2011.0014
[4]  
Brophy S., 2007, P ANN C AM SOC ENG E
[5]   Advancing Engineering Education in P-12 Classrooms [J].
Brophy, Sean ;
Klein, Stacy ;
Portsmore, Merredith ;
Rogers, Chris .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2008, 97 (03) :369-387
[6]   Early Childhood Science and Engineering: Engaging Platforms for Fostering Domain-General Learning Skills [J].
Bustamante, Andres S. ;
Greenfield, Daryl B. ;
Nayfeld, Irena .
EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2018, 8 (03)
[7]  
Chen JJ, 2017, J RES CHILD EDUC, V31, P324, DOI 10.1080/02568543.2017.1309479
[8]   Teachers' Literal and Inferential Questions and Children's Responses: A Study of Teacher-Child Linguistic Interactions During Whole-Group Instruction in Hong Kong Kindergarten Classrooms [J].
Chen, Jennifer J. ;
Liang, Xiaoting .
EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION JOURNAL, 2017, 45 (05) :671-683
[9]  
Cheung RHP, 2017, PEDAGOG CULT SOC, V25, P73, DOI 10.1080/14681366.2016.1217253
[10]  
Cunningham R, 2014, INFORMATION ENVIRONMENTALISM: A GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, P117