Architectural Design for a Secure Linux Operating System

被引:0
作者
Narayanan, Hari [1 ]
Radhakrishnan, Vivek [1 ]
Shiju-Sathyadevan [1 ]
Poroor, Jayaraj [2 ]
机构
[1] Amrita Univ, Amrita Ctr Cybersecur Syst & Networks, Amrita Sch Engn, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri, India
[2] EnergiMate, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
来源
2017 2ND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, SIGNAL PROCESSING AND NETWORKING (WISPNET) | 2017年
关键词
Linux; authorization; principle of least privilege; security ticket; sandbox;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Operating system security is a hot research area for the past several decades. Various security mechanisms have been introduced till now to secure the operating system. In this paper we are focusing on securing Linux operating system. Even though Linux is open source and large numbers of people are involved in developing kernel patches for security holes, there are still many malwares to exploit the existing vulnerabilities. Using our architecture we are trying to minimize the damage done by the malwares if not blocking them altogether. Our architecture is designed to ensure the principle of least privilege. Principle of least privilege guarantees that a process will get the privileges just enough to perform its task. This ensures that even if the process is compromised it can do the least damage to the system as it is running in a sandbox. Major chunk of our system is running in the user level to make it portable across the distributions. Our system uses a specially structured security ticket to provide fine grained authorization to user processes which is not currently possible in the traditional linux architecture. The security ticket is designed in such a way that it can be inherited by a child process, can be shared and is unforgeable. The core module in the system is called Secd (Secure Daemon) which authorizes all the requests and also manages the security tickets.
引用
收藏
页码:949 / 953
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [11] Loscocco P, 2001, USENIX ASSOCIATION PROCEEDINGS OF THE FREENIX TRACK, P29
  • [12] Mehra Misha, 2015, INDIA C INDICON 2015, P1
  • [13] Murray A.P., 2008, P 6 AUSTRALASIAN C I, V81, P19
  • [14] Provos N., 2003, USENIX SECURITY, V3, P19
  • [15] PROTECTION OF INFORMATION IN COMPUTER SYSTEMS
    SALTZER, JH
    SCHROEDER, MD
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 1975, 63 (09) : 1278 - 1308
  • [16] Empowering End Users to Confine Their Own Applications: The Results of a Usability Study Comparing SELinux, AppArmor, and FBAC-LSM
    Schreuders, Z. Cliffe
    McGill, Tanya
    Payne, Christian
    [J]. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION AND SYSTEM SECURITY, 2011, 14 (02)
  • [17] Ul Haq MS, 2016, 2016 IEEE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, NETWORKING, ELECTRONIC AND AUTOMATION CONTROL CONFERENCE (ITNEC), P557, DOI 10.1109/ITNEC.2016.7560422