Patient satisfaction with conventional dentures vs. digital dentures fabricated using 3D-printing: A randomized crossover trial

被引:27
作者
Ohara, Katsura [1 ]
Isshiki, Yukari [1 ]
Hoshi, Noriyuki [1 ]
Ohno, Akinori [1 ]
Kawanishi, Norishige [1 ]
Nagashima, Shintaro [1 ]
Inoue, Makoto [1 ]
Kubo, Daijiro [1 ]
Yamaya, Katsuhiko [2 ]
Inoue, Erika [2 ]
Kimoto, Katsuhiko [1 ]
机构
[1] Kanagawa Dent Univ, Grad Sch Dent, Dept Oral Interdisciplinary Med Prosthodont & Ora, 82 Inaokacho, Yokosuka, Kanagawa 2388580, Japan
[2] Kanagawa Dent Univ Hosp, Tech Dept, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan
关键词
Patient satisfaction; 3D-printed dentures; Crossover trial; CAD-CAM; CAD/CAM; FUTURE; TECHNOLOGY; DENTISTRY;
D O I
10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_21_00048
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Evidence regarding the performance of digital dentures (DDs) fabricated using 3D printing is insufficient. This study aimed to evaluate patient satisfaction with conventional dentures (CDs) and DDs fabricated using 3D printing. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted between November 2017 and May 2020. In the CD-DD group, CDs were fabricated before DDs, while the protocol was reversed in the DD-CD group. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction, quantified using a 100-mm visual analog scale, which assessed chewing efficiency, pain, stability, retention, comfort, esthetics, ease of cleaning, phonetics, and general satisfaction. Secondary outcomes were quality of life (QOL), number of visits, time required for definitive denture fabrication, number of adjustment appointments, and time required for denture stabilization after denture delivery. Results: Patient satisfaction with CDs was superior in terms of phonetics, ease of cleaning, stability, comfort, and general satisfaction. Secondary outcomes such as social disability and the number of clinic visits were significantly lower in patients with DDs. However, the two groups showed no significant differences in the other outcomes. Although patient satisfaction with DDs was inferior to that with CDs, 20% of patients preferred and used DDs (12 patients preferred CDs, and three patients opted for DDs). Conclusion: Although patient satisfaction or QOL with DDs may be somewhat inferior to that with CDs, 20% of patients preferred and used DDs daily. Thus, DDs fabricated using 3D printing may have comparable practicality and efficacy to CDs.
引用
收藏
页码:623 / 629
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [21] Patient ratings of chewing ability from a randomised crossover trial:: lingualised vs. first premolar canine-guided occlusion for complete dentures
    Heydecke, Guido
    Akkad, Ahmed Shadi
    Wolkewitz, Martin
    Vogeler, Michael
    Tuerp, Jens C.
    Strub, Joerg R.
    GERODONTOLOGY, 2007, 24 (02) : 77 - 86
  • [22] Comparison of the color stability and surface roughness of 3-unit provisional fixed partial dentures fabricated by milling, conventional and different 3D printing fabrication techniques
    Ellakany, Passent
    Fouda, Shaimaa M.
    AlGhamdi, Maram A.
    Aly, Nourhan M.
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2023, 131
  • [23] Evaluation of the accuracy of digital indirect bonding vs. conventional systems: a randomized clinical trial
    Ueno, Eloisa Peixoto Soares
    de Carvalho, Teresa Cristina Alvez da Silva Gonzalez
    Kanashiro, Lylian Kazumi
    Ursi, Weber
    Chilvarquer, Israel
    Neto, Jose Rino
    de Paiva, Joao Batista
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2025, 95 (01) : 3 - 11
  • [24] Evaluation of masticatory performance and patient satisfaction for conventional and 3D-printed implant overdentures: a randomized crossover study
    Nabil, Mohamed Shady
    Mahanna, Fatma Fathe
    Said, Mohamed Moustafa
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [25] Patient-centered outcomes comparing digital and conventional implant impression procedures: a randomized crossover trial
    Joda, Tim
    Bragger, Urs
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (12) : E185 - E189
  • [26] Patient-reported outcomes and framework fit accuracy of removable partial dentures fabricated using digital techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Almufleh, Balqees
    Arellanob, Alexia
    Tamimi, Faleh
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2024, 33 (07): : 626 - 636
  • [27] CAD-CAM complete removable dental prostheses: A double-blind, randomized, crossover clinical trial evaluating milled and 3D-printed dentures
    Srinivasan, Murali
    Kalberer, Nicole
    Fankhauser, Nicolas
    Naharro, Manuel
    Maniewicz, Sabrina
    Mueller, Frauke
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2021, 115
  • [28] Randomized Trial of Telegenetics vs. In-Person Cancer Genetic Counseling: Cost, Patient Satisfaction and Attendance
    Buchanan, Adam H.
    Datta, Santanu K.
    Skinner, Celette Sugg
    Hollowell, Gail P.
    Beresford, Henry F.
    Freeland, Thomas
    Rogers, Benjamin
    Boling, John
    Marcom, P. Kelly
    Adams, Martha B.
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2015, 24 (06) : 961 - 970
  • [29] Accuracy of Multi-implant Impressions Using 3D-Printing Custom Trays and Splinting Versus Conventional Techniques for Complete Arches
    Liu, Yanping
    Di, Ping
    Zhao, Yijiao
    Hao, Qiang
    Tian, Jiehua
    Cui, Hongyan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2019, 34 (04) : 1007 - 1014
  • [30] Effect of artificial aging and different surface finishing protocols on the flexural strength and surface hardness of a photopolymer for manufacturing monolithic polychromatic complete dentures using PolyJet 3D printing
    Azpiazu-Flores, Francisco X.
    Elfana, Ahmed
    Yang, Chao-Chieh
    Morton, Dean
    Lin, Wei-Shao
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2024,