Treatment effects of R-Appliance and Frankel-2 in Class II division 1 malocclusions

被引:0
作者
Showkatbakhsh, R. [1 ]
Castaldo, M. I. [2 ]
Jamilian, A. [3 ]
Padricelli, G. [2 ]
Hanzayi, M. Fahimi [4 ]
Cappabianca, S. [5 ]
Perillo, L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Dept Orthodont, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Naples 2, Dept Orthodont, Naples, Italy
[3] Islamic Azad Univ, Ctr Craniofacial Res, Dept Orthodont, Dent Branch, Tehran, Iran
[4] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Orthodont, Dent Branch, Tehran, Iran
[5] Univ Naples 2, Dept Radiol, Naples, Italy
关键词
Class II Division 1; Frankel; 2; Functional Appliance; Mandibular deficiency; R-appliance; TWIN-BLOCK; ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT; FUNCTIONAL APPLIANCES; FUNCTION REGULATOR; MANDIBULAR CHANGES; FR-2; APPLIANCE; PREVALENCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of a differently designed functional appliance (the R-appliance) with Frankel-2. Study Design Twenty-seven patients (16 girls and 11 boys) with a mean age of 9.8 (SD 1.6) years were treated with the R-appliance for 15.4 (SD 0.4) months and twenty-seven (15 girls and 12 boys) patients with a mean age of 9.1 (SD 1.1) years were treated with a Frankel-2 appliance for 19 (SD 5.6) months. All patients had Class II division 1 malocclusions due to mandibular deficiency and all of them had prepubertal stages of skeletal development. Lateral cephalograms obtained at the beginning (T1) and at the end (T2) of the study were analysed. Results Paired t-tests showed that SNB significantly increased in both groups. The incisor mandibular plane angle (IMPA) was reduced in the R-appliance group by 2.2 (SD 4.9) degrees (P < 0.03) but increased by 2.2 (SD 2.6) degrees (P < 0.001) in the Frankel-2 group. The SNA in the R-appliance group showed an increase of 0.2 (SD 2) degrees (P < 0.6), while it was decreased by 0.4 (SD 0.5) degrees (P < 0.6) in the Frankel-2 group. Conclusions Both treatment modalities were successful in moving the mandible forward. However, with the R-appliance, this was achieved without proclination of the lower incisors.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 22
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], AM J ORTHOD DENTOFAC
[2]  
Baccetti T, 2001, CRANIO GROW, V38, P237
[3]  
Baccetti T., 2005, Seminars in Orthodontics, V11, P119, DOI [10.1053/J.SODO.2005.04.005, 10.1053/j.sodo.2005.04.005, DOI 10.1053/J.SODO.2005.04.005]
[4]   Prevalence and distribution of selected occlusal characteristics in the US population, 1988-1991 [J].
Brunnelle, JA ;
Bhat, M ;
Lipton, JA .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1996, 75 :706-713
[6]  
Cozza P., 2006, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, V129, P599
[7]   FRANKEL APPLIANCE THERAPY - ORTHOPEDIC OR ORTHODONTIC [J].
CREEKMORE, TD ;
RADNEY, LJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1983, 83 (02) :89-108
[8]  
Dahlberg G., 1940, STAT METHOD MEDICAL
[9]  
de Almeida MR, 2002, ANGLE ORTHOD, V72, P418
[10]   An international comparison of early treatment of angle class-II/1 casesSkeletal effects of the first phase of a prospective clinical trialEin internationaler Vergleich zur Frühbehandlung von Angle-Klasse-II/1-DysgnathienSkelettale Effekte der ersten Phase einer prospektiven klinischen Studie [J].
Ulrike Ehmer ;
Camilla J. F. Tulloch ;
William R. Proffit ;
Ceib Phillips .
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 1999, 60 (6) :392-408