Outcomes and predictors of difficulty with coronary sinus lead removal

被引:18
作者
Sheldon, Seth
Friedman, Paul A.
Hayes, David L.
Osborn, Michael J.
Cha, Yong-Mei
Rea, Robert F.
Asirvatham, Samuel J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Cardiovasc Dis, Dept Internal Med, Coll Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Pediat Cardiol, Dept Pediat & Adolescent Med, Coll Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
Coronary sinus; CRT; Left ventricular lead; Biventricular pacing; Lead extraction; Lead removal; Complications; Laser lead extraction; Snare; Locking stylet; Pacing lead complication; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY; DEFIBRILLATOR LEADS; VENOUS SYSTEM; SINGLE-CENTER; EXTRACTION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGIST; EXPERIENCE; PACEMAKER; ANATOMY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1007/s10840-012-9685-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
With increasing coronary sinus (CS) pacemaker leads for cardiac resynchronization therapy, the need to remove these leads has risen. The purpose of this study is to describe a single center's experience with CS lead removal and to attempt to identify predictors of difficulty with lead removal and complications. We reviewed all percutaneous endocardial CS lead removals performed at our institution through February 2010. Successful removal with traction alone was considered simple while complex extractions required traction devices and/or laser sheaths. Between December 1996 and February 2010, 125 CS leads were percutaneously removed a parts per thousand yen1 week post-implantation from 115 patients. One attempt at CS lead extraction was unsuccessful. The average duration since implantation for the CS leads was 1.54 years (+/- .75 years, range 8 days to 8.24 years). The majority of the leads were removed by simple traction (n = 114, 91.2 %). The remainder were removed by femoral approach with snare (n = 3, 2.4 %), locking stylet (n = 2, 1.6 %), or locking stylet and laser sheath (n = 6, 4.8 %). Half of CS leads in place greater than 4 years required complex extraction (n = 7/14, 50 %). CS complications (n = 11 patients, 8.8 %) included CS or tributary thrombosis (n = 7/102, 6.9 %) and CS dissection (n = 4/102, 3.9 %). Major non-CS complications (n = 2 patients, 1.6 %) included a cardiac tear requiring pericardiocentesis and thoracotomy (n = 1, 0.8 %) and subclavian vein tear requiring surgical repair (n = 1, 0.8 %). Minor non-CS complications (n = 9 patients, 7.2 %) included a pneumothorax (n = 1, 0.8 %), hematoma (n = 2, 1.6 %), subclavian vein thrombosis (n = 3, x%), and blood transfusion (n = 5, 4.0 %). A longer duration since implantation and larger lead diameter were associated with complex versus simple removal (p < .0001 and p = .0009 respectively). Percutaneous CS lead removal is successful by simple traction alone in the vast majority of cases. CS leads in place greater than 4 years, however, often require complex extraction. Specific extraction techniques can be implemented when simple traction is unsuccessful without an appreciable increase in complications.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 100
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Fibrotic Tissue Growth into the Extendable Lobes of an Active Fixation Coronary Sinus Lead Can Complicate Extraction [J].
Baranowski, Bryan ;
Yerkey, Michael ;
Dresing, Thomas ;
Wilkoff, Bruce L. .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 34 (07) :E64-E65
[2]   Usefulness of mechanical transvenous dilation and location of areas of adherence in patients undergoing coronary sinus lead extraction [J].
Bongiorni, Maria Grazia ;
Zucchelli, Giulio ;
Soldati, Ezio ;
Arena, Giuseppe ;
Giannola, Gabriele ;
Di Cori, Andrea ;
Lapira, Federica ;
Bartoli, Chiara ;
Segreti, Luca ;
De Lucia, Raffaele ;
Barsotti, Antonio .
EUROPACE, 2007, 9 (01) :69-73
[3]   Extraction of Old Pacemaker or Cardioverter-Defibrillator Leads by Laser Sheath Versus Femoral Approach [J].
Bordachar, Pierre ;
Defaye, Pascal ;
Peyrouse, Eric ;
Boveda, Serge ;
Mokrani, Bilel ;
Marquie, Christelle ;
Barandon, Laurent ;
Fossaert, Emilie Marcant ;
Garrigue, Stephane ;
Reuter, Sylvain ;
Laborderie, Julien ;
Marijon, Eloi ;
Deharo, Jean-Claude ;
Jacon, Peggy ;
Kacet, Salem ;
Ploux, Sylvain ;
Deplagne, Antoine ;
Haissaguerre, Michel ;
Clementy, Jacques ;
Ritter, Philippe ;
Klug, Didier .
CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 3 (04) :319-323
[4]   Implications and outcome of permanent coronary sinus lead extraction and reimplantation [J].
Burke, MC ;
Morton, J ;
Lin, AC ;
Tierney, S ;
Desai, A ;
Hong, T ;
Kim, S ;
Salem, Y ;
Alberts, M ;
Knight, BP .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 16 (08) :830-837
[5]   INTRAVASCULAR LEAD EXTRACTION USING LOCKING STYLETS AND SHEATHS [J].
BYRD, CL ;
SCHWARTZ, SJ ;
HEDIN, NB ;
GOODE, LB ;
FEARNOT, NE ;
SMITH, HJ .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 13 (12) :1871-1875
[6]   Chronic performance of an active fixation coronary sinus lead [J].
Crossley, George H. ;
Exner, Derek ;
Mead, R. Hardwin ;
Sorrentino, Robert A. ;
Hokanson, Robert ;
Li, Shelby ;
Adler, Stuart .
HEART RHYTHM, 2010, 7 (04) :472-478
[7]   Safety and feasibility of coronary sinus left ventricular leads extraction: A preliminary report [J].
De Martino, G ;
Orazi, S ;
Bisignani, G ;
Toscano, S ;
Messano, L ;
Parisi, Q ;
Santamaria, M ;
Pelargonio, G ;
Dello Russo, A ;
Bellocci, F ;
Zecchi, P ;
Crea, F .
JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 13 (01) :35-38
[8]   The anatomy of the coronary sinus venous system for the cardiac electrophysiologist [J].
Habib, Ammar ;
Lachman, Nirusha ;
Christensen, Kevin N. ;
Asirvatham, Samuel J. .
EUROPACE, 2009, 11 :15-21
[9]   Extraction of chronic pacemaker and defibrillator leads from the coronary sinus: laser infrequently used but required [J].
Hamid, Shoaib ;
Arujna, Aruna ;
Khan, Sitara ;
Ladwiniec, Andrew ;
McPhail, Mark ;
Bostock, Julian ;
Mobb, Margaret ;
Patel, Nik ;
Bucknall, Cliff ;
Rinaldi, Christopher A. .
EUROPACE, 2009, 11 (02) :213-215
[10]   Large, single-center, single-operator experience with transvenous lead extraction: Outcomes and changing indications [J].
Jones, Samuel O. ;
Eckart, Robert E. ;
Albert, Christine M. ;
Epstein, Laurence M. .
HEART RHYTHM, 2008, 5 (04) :520-525