Simulator training reduces radiation exposure and improves trainees' performance in placing electrophysiologic catheters during patient-based procedures

被引:38
作者
De Ponti, Roberto [1 ]
Marazzi, Raffaella [1 ]
Doni, Lorenzo A. [1 ]
Tamborini, Claudio [1 ]
Ghiringhelli, Sergio [1 ]
Salerno-Uriarte, Jorge A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Insubria, Osped Circolo & Fdn Macchi, Dept Heart Brain & Vessels, IT-21100 Varese, Italy
关键词
Electrophysiologic study; Interventional electrophysiology; Medical training; Radiation exposure; Simulation in health care; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.04.015
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Currently, training in interventional electrophysiology is based on conventional methodologies, and a paucity of data on the usefulness of simulation in this field is available. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of simulator training on trainees' performance in electrophysiologic catheter placement during the early phase of their learning curve. METHODS Inexperienced electrophysiology fellows were considered. A hybrid high-fidelity simulator (Procedicus VIST, version 7.0, Mentice AB Gothenburg, Sweden for Biosense Webster) was used. The following parameters were evaluated in 3 consecutive patient-based procedures before and after two training sessions of at least 1.5 hours on the simulator: (1) ability to place catheters in conventional recording/pacing sites (coronary sinus, His-bundle area, high right atrium, and right ventricular apex); (2) amount of help provided by the supervisor (scale from 1-3; 3 for maximal help); (3) fluoroscopy time; and (4) positioning time. RESULTS Seven fellows performed 168 catheter placements during 42 patient-based procedures with no complications. Comparing parameters before and after simulator training, there was a significant reduction in the mean amount of help and in fluoroscopy and positioning times per placement: from 1.71 +/- 1.24 to 0.42 +/- 0.68 (P < .001), from 121 +/- 88 seconds to 76 +/- 54 seconds (P < .001), and from 175 +/- 138 seconds to 102 +/- 74 seconds (P < .001), respectively. Overall fluoroscopy time per patient decreased from 567 +/- 220 seconds to 305 +/- 111 seconds (P < .0001). Improvement appeared to be related to simulator training alone and not to the previously performed patient-based procedures. CONCLUSION During the early phase of the trainees' learning curve, simulator training significantly improves the independent trainees' performance with reduction in radiation exposure.
引用
收藏
页码:1280 / 1285
页数:6
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] De Ponti R, 2009, PROGR CARDIAC ARRHYT, P109
  • [2] Superiority of Simulator-Based Training Compared With Conventional Training Methodologies in the Performance of Transseptal Catheterization
    De Ponti, Roberto
    Marazzi, Raffaella
    Ghiringhelli, Sergio
    Salerno-Uriarte, Jorge A.
    Calkins, Hugh
    Cheng, Alan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 58 (04) : 359 - 363
  • [3] Virtual reality training for the operating room and cardiac catheterisation laboratory
    Gallagher, AG
    Cates, CU
    [J]. LANCET, 2004, 364 (9444) : 1538 - 1540
  • [4] ACCF/AHA/HRS/SCAI clinical competence statement on physician knowledge to optimize patient safety and image quality in fluoroscopically guided invasive cardiovascular procedures - A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training
    Hirshfeld, JW
    Balter, SD
    Brinker, JA
    Kern, MJ
    Klein, LW
    Lindsay, BD
    Tommaso, CL
    Tracy, CM
    Wagner, LK
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2005, 111 (04) : 511 - 532
  • [5] A Technical and Cognitive Skills Evaluation of Performance in Interventional Cardiology Procedures Using Medical Simulation
    Lipner, Rebecca S.
    Messenger, John C.
    Kangilaski, Roberta
    Baim, Donald S.
    Holmes, David R., Jr.
    Williams, David O.
    King, Spencer B., III
    [J]. SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2010, 5 (02): : 65 - 74
  • [6] Naccarelli Gerald V, 2008, J Am Coll Cardiol, V51, P374, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.11.014
  • [7] Simulation for Learning and Teaching Procedural Skills The State of the Science
    Nestel, Debra
    Groom, Jeffrey
    Eikeland-Husebo, Sissel
    O'Donnell, John M.
    [J]. SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2011, 6 : S10 - S13
  • [8] Learning curves and reliability measures for virtual reality simulation in the performance assessment of carotid angiography
    Patel, AD
    Gallagher, AG
    Nicholson, WJ
    Cates, CU
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 47 (09) : 1796 - 1802
  • [9] Learning curve for ablation of atrial fibrillation in medium-volume centers
    Sairaku, Akinori
    Nakano, Yukiko
    Oda, Noboru
    Makita, Yuko
    Kajihara, Kenta
    Tokuyama, Takehito
    Kihara, Yasuki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 57 (03) : 263 - 268