The Benefit of a Wireless Contralateral Routing of Signals (CROS) Microphone in Unilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients

被引:10
作者
Kurien, George [1 ]
Hwang, Euna [1 ]
Smilsky, Kari [1 ]
Smith, Leah [1 ]
Lin, Vincent Y. W. [1 ]
Nedzelski, Julian [1 ]
Chen, Joseph M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Contralateral routing of signals; speech perception; unilateral cochlear implant; wireless; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; SPEECH RECOGNITION; LOCALIZATION; PRIORITIES; SYSTEM; USERS; NOISE;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0000000000002078
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Assess speech outcomes in unilateral cochlear implant (CI) recipients after addition of a wireless contralateral routing of signals (CROS) microphone. Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Ambulatory. Patients: Sixteen adult unilateral CI users with nonserviceable hearing on the contralateral side were recruited. Those with AzBio sentence scores of 40 to 80% or Hearing in Noise Test - Quiet (HINT-Q) scores of 60 to 90% with a CI alone were eligible participants. Intervention: Speech testing was carried out with the CROS on and off. Main Outcome Measure: Speech recognition. Results: In the consonant-nucleus-consonant test presented in quiet from the front, word scores were 64.4 (CI) and 63.8% (CI + CROS) (p = 0.72), and phoneme scores were 80.2 (CI) and 80.8% (CI + CROS) (p = 0.65). In AzBio sentence testing in quiet, with the signals projected from the contralateral, front, or ipsilateral to the CI, speech perception with the CI alone was 60.8, 75.9, and 79.1%. With the addition of the CROS microphone, using the same speaker arrangement, speech perception was 69.8 (p < 0.05), 71.8 (p = 0.05), and 71.8 (p < 0.05). In AzBio sentence testing in noise, speech perception with the CI alone was 18.6, 45.3, and 56.3% when signals were projected from contralateral, front, and ipsilateral sides to the CI. The addition of the CROS microphone led to speech perception of 45.3 (p < 0.05), 45.3 (p = 0.86), and 51.4% (p = 0.27) in the same paradigm. Conclusions: Addition of a wireless CROS microphone to a unilateral CI recipient can improve users' perception of speech in both quiet and noise if speech signals come from the deaf ear, mitigating the head shadow effect.
引用
收藏
页码:E82 / E88
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Low-Frequency Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Normal Hearing in the Contralateral Ear
    Dillon, Margaret T.
    Buss, Emily
    Rooth, Meredith A.
    King, English R.
    Pillsbury, Harold C.
    Brown, Kevin D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2019, 62 (08): : 2860 - 2871
  • [32] Can the use of the CROS system provide head shadow effect contribution to unilateral Cochlear Implant Users?
    Hiromi Hoshino, Ana Cristina
    Schmidt Goffi-Gomez, Maria Valeria
    Samuel Sierra, Paola Angelica
    Agrawal, Smita
    Rodriguez, Carina
    Martinho de Carvalho, Ana Claudia
    Tsuji, Robinson Koji
    [J]. CODAS, 2022, 34 (05):
  • [33] Effect of central auditory processing disorders on contralateral routing of offside signals (CROS) hearing aids performance
    Galhom, Dalia Helal
    Elnabtity, Nadia Mohamed
    [J]. HEARING BALANCE AND COMMUNICATION, 2023, 21 (04) : 240 - 245
  • [34] Benefit of directional microphones for unilateral, bilateral and bimodal cochlear implant users
    Ernst, Arneborg
    Anton, Kristina
    Brendel, Martina
    Battmer, Rolf-Dieter
    [J]. COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 20 (03) : 147 - 157
  • [35] Contralateral hearing aid use in adult cochlear implant recipients: retrospective analysis of auditory outcomes
    Mertens, Griet
    Andries, Ellen
    Clement, Charis
    Cochet, Ellen
    Hofkens-Van den Brandt, Anouk
    Jacquemin, Laure
    Joossen, Iris
    Vermeersch, Hanne
    Lammers, Marc Jan-Willem
    Van Rompaey, Vincent
    Vanderveken, Olivier
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2024, 63 (07) : 543 - 550
  • [36] Automatic segmentation of intra-cochlear anatomy in post-implantation CT of unilateral cochlear implant recipients
    Reda, Fitsum A.
    McRackan, Theodore R.
    Labadie, Robert F.
    Dawant, Benoit M.
    Noble, Jack H.
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2014, 18 (03) : 605 - 615
  • [37] Benefit and predictive factors for speech perception outcomes in pediatric bilateral cochlear implant recipients
    Chang, Young-Soo
    Hong, Sung Hwa
    Kim, Eun Yeon
    Choi, Ji Eun
    Chung, Won-Ho
    Cho, Yang-Sun
    Moon, Il Joon
    [J]. BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 85 (05) : 571 - 577
  • [38] Evaluation of a wireless contralateral routing of signal (CROS) device with the Advanced Bionics Naida CI Q90 sound processor
    Ernst, Arneborg
    Baumgaertel, Regina M.
    Diez, Angie
    Battmer, Rolf-Dieter
    [J]. COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 20 (04) : 182 - 189
  • [39] Evaluation of Speech Recognition of Cochlear Implant Recipients Using Adaptive, Digital Remote Microphone Technology and a Speech Enhancement Sound Processing Algorithm
    Wolfe, Jace
    Morais, Mila
    Schafer, Erin
    Agrawal, Smita
    Koch, Dawn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2015, 26 (05) : 502 - 508
  • [40] Clinical Application of Spectral Modulation Detection: Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid
    Kessler, David M.
    Wolfe, Jace
    Blanchard, Michelle
    Gifford, Rene H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2020, 63 (05): : 1561 - 1571