Managers' Equity Incentives and Asymmetric Cost Behavior

被引:7
作者
Brisker, Eric R. [1 ]
Park, Jong Chool [2 ]
Song, Hakjoon [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Akron, Coll Business, Dept Finance, Akron, OH 44325 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, Muma Coll Business, Lynn Pippenger Sch Accountancy, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[3] Calif State Univ Dominguez Hills, Coll Business Adm & Publ Policy, Dept Accounting, Carson, CA 90747 USA
关键词
executive compensation; equity incentives; asymmetric cost behavior; INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY SET; STOCK OPTION PORTFOLIOS; RISK-TAKING INCENTIVES; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION; CEO COMPENSATION; FIRM PERFORMANCE; IMPACT; DIVERSIFICATION; SENSITIVITIES;
D O I
10.2308/JMAR-17-029
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Recent research documents the phenomenon of sticky cost behavior where costs change asymmetrically between an increase and a decrease in sales and attributes this behavior to managers' deliberate decisions. In this paper, we test the relationship between sticky cost behavior and equity incentives. We find that a measure of the sensitivity of managerial wealth to stock price (delta) is positively related to sticky costs where costs increase more quickly in response to a sales increase than they decline in response to a sales decrease. Conversely, we find that a measure of the sensitivity of managerial wealth to stock volatility (vega) is positively related to anti-sticky costs where costs increase to a lesser extent in response to a sales increase than they decline in response to a sales decrease. These results indicate the importance that equity incentives have on managerial resource adjustment decisions in response to changes in firm activity levels.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 69
页数:27
相关论文
共 92 条
[31]   CORPORATE FOCUS AND STOCK RETURNS [J].
COMMENT, R ;
JARRELL, GA .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 37 (01) :67-87
[32]   Estimating the value of employee stock option portfolios and their sensitivities to price and volatility [J].
Core, J ;
Guay, W .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2002, 40 (03) :613-630
[33]   The use of equity grants to manage optimal equity incentive levels [J].
Core, J ;
Guay, W .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1999, 28 (02) :151-184
[34]   Corporate governance and pay-for-performance: The impact of earnings management [J].
Cornett, Marcia Millon ;
Marcus, Alan J. ;
Tehranian, Hassan .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 87 (02) :357-373
[35]  
Daniel N., 2004, The hidden cost of managerial incentives: Evidence from the bond and stock markets
[36]   Executive compensation and corporate acquisition decisions [J].
Datta, S ;
Iskandar-Datta, M ;
Raman, K .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2001, 56 (06) :2299-2336
[37]   THE EFFECT OF EXECUTIVE STOCK OPTION PLANS ON STOCKHOLDERS AND BONDHOLDERS [J].
DEFUSCO, RA ;
JOHNSON, RR ;
ZORN, TS .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1990, 45 (02) :617-627
[38]   Do Managerial Incentives Drive Cost Behavior? Evidence about the Role of the Zero Earnings Benchmark for Labor Cost Behavior in Private Belgian Firms [J].
Dierynck, Bart ;
Landsman, Wayne R. ;
Renders, Annelies .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2012, 87 (04) :1219-1246
[39]  
Dixit A.K., 1994, Investment under uncertainty, DOI [10.1515/9781400830176, DOI 10.1515/9781400830176]
[40]   Do executive stock options induce excessive risk taking? [J].
Dong, Zhiyong ;
Wang, Cong ;
Xie, Fei .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2010, 34 (10) :2518-2529