Glucokinase Deficit Prevalence in Women With Diabetes in Pregnancy: A Matter of Screening Selection

被引:5
作者
Bitterman, Olimpia [1 ]
Giuliani, Chiara [2 ]
Festa, Camilla [2 ]
Napoli, Angela [1 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, St Andrea Hosp, Dept Clin & Mol Med, Rome, Italy
[2] Sapienza Univ Rome, St Andrea Hosp, Dept Expt Med, Rome, Italy
关键词
monogenic diabetes mellitus; glucokinase (GCK) gene mutation; gestational diabetes; MODY; hyperglycemia; MUTATIONS; HYPERGLYCEMIA; MELLITUS; GENE;
D O I
10.3389/fendo.2020.00268
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The prevalence among pregnant women with diabetes of monogenic diabetes due to glucokinase deficit (GCK-MODY) varies from 0 to 80% in different studies, based on the chosen selection criteria for genetic test. New pregnancy-specific Screening Criteria (NSC), validated on an Anglo-Celtic pregnant cohort, have been proposed and include pre-pregnancy BMI 99 mg/dl. Our aim was to estimate the prevalence of GCK-MODY and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of NSC in our population of women with diabetes in pregnancy. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively selected from our database of 468 diabetic pregnant patients in Sant'Andrea Hospital, in Rome, from 2010 to 2018, all the women who received a genetic test for GCK deficit because of specific clinical features. We estimated the prevalence of GCK-MODY among tested women and the minimum prevalence in our entire population with non-autoimmune diabetes. We evaluated diagnostic performance of NSC on the tested cohort and estimated the eligibility to genetic test based on NSC in the entire population. Results: A total of 409 patients had diabetes in pregnancy, excluding those with autoimmune diabetes; 21 patients have been tested for GCK-MODY, 8 have been positive and 13 have been negative (2 of them had HNF1-alfa mutations and 1 had HNF4-alfa mutation). We found no significant differences in clinical features between positive and negative groups except for fasting glycemia, which was higher in the positive group. The minimum prevalence of monogenic diabetes in our population was 2.4%. The minimum prevalence of GCK-MODY was 1.95%. In the tested cohort, the prevalence of GCK-MODY was 38%. In this group, NSC sensitivity is 87% and specificity is 30%, positive predictive value is 43%, and negative predictive value is 80%. Applying NSC on the entire population of women with non-autoimmune diabetes in pregnancy, 41 patients (10%) would be eligible for genetic test; considering a fasting glycemia >92 mg/dl, 85 patients (20.7%) would be eligible. Discussion: In our population, NSC have good sensitivity but low specificity, probably because there are many GDM with GCK-MODY like features. It is mandatory to define selective criteria with a good diagnostic performance on Italian population, to avoid unnecessary genetic tests.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Carli A, 2018, RAPPORTO OSSERVASALU, V2018, P44
[2]   Recognition and Management of Individuals With Hyperglycemia Because of a Heterozygous Glucokinase Mutation [J].
Chakera, Ali J. ;
Steele, Anna M. ;
Gloyn, Anna L. ;
Shepherd, Maggie H. ;
Shields, Beverley ;
Ellard, Sian ;
Hattersley, Andrew T. .
DIABETES CARE, 2015, 38 (07) :1383-1392
[3]   The 0.1% of the Population With Glucokinase Monogenic Diabetes Can Be Recognized by Clinical Characteristics in Pregnancy: The Atlantic Diabetes in Pregnancy Cohort [J].
Chakera, Ali J. ;
Spyer, Gill ;
Vincent, Nicola ;
Ellard, Sian ;
Hattersley, Andrew T. ;
Dunne, Fidelma P. .
DIABETES CARE, 2014, 37 (05) :1230-1236
[4]   Best practice guidelines for the molecular genetic diagnosis of maturity-onset diabetes of the young [J].
Ellard, S. ;
Bellanne-Chantelot, C. ;
Hattersley, A. T. .
DIABETOLOGIA, 2008, 51 (04) :546-553
[5]   A high prevalence of glucokinase mutations in gestational diabetic subjects selected by clinical criteria [J].
Ellard, S ;
Beards, F ;
Allen, LIS ;
Shepherd, M ;
Ballantyne, E ;
Harvey, R ;
Hattersley, AT .
DIABETOLOGIA, 2000, 43 (02) :250-253
[6]  
Gjesing AP, 2017, J ENDOCR SOC, V1, P681, DOI 10.1210/js.2017-00040
[7]   All classifications not built on pathogenesis become inadequate sooner or later [J].
Iafusco, D. ;
Galderisi, A. ;
Lombardo, F. ;
Scaramuzza, A. ;
Tartaglia, E. ;
Cocca, A. ;
Giugliano, R. ;
Giugliano, B. ;
Sena, T. ;
Napoli, A. ;
Mastrantonio, P. ;
Stoppoloni, F. ;
Prisco, F. .
DIABETOLOGIA, 2011, 54 (06) :1583-1584
[8]   Glucokinase mutations in a phenotypically selected multiethnic group of women with a history of gestational diabetes [J].
Kousta, E ;
Ellard, S ;
Allen, LIS ;
Saker, PJ ;
Huxtable, SJ ;
Hattersley, AT ;
McCarthy, MI .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2001, 18 (08) :683-684
[9]  
Metzger BE, 2008, NEW ENGL J MED, V358, P1991, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa0707943
[10]   Atlantic Diabetes in Pregnancy (DIP): the prevalence and outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus using new diagnostic criteria [J].
O'Sullivan, E. P. ;
Avalos, G. ;
O'Reilly, M. ;
Dennedy, M. C. ;
Gaffney, G. ;
Dunne, F. .
DIABETOLOGIA, 2011, 54 (07) :1670-1675