Can you feel what you do not see? Using internal feedback to detect briefly presented emotional stimuli

被引:52
作者
Bornemann, Boris [2 ]
Winkielman, Piotr [1 ,3 ]
van der Meer, Elke [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Psychol, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Humboldt Univ, Dept Cognit Psychol, D-12489 Berlin, Germany
[3] Warsaw Sch Social Sci & Humanities, PL-03815 Warsaw, Poland
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Subliminal stimuli; Emotional faces; Facial electromyography; Biofeedback; Unconscious affect; FACIAL MIMICRY; RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; EXPRESSIONS; JUDGMENTS; BEHAVIOR; FACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.04.007
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Briefly presented (e.g., 10 ms) emotional stimuli (e.g., angry faces) can influence behavior and physiology. Yet, they are difficult to identify in an emotion detection task. The current study investigated whether identification can be improved by focusing participants on their internal reactions. In addition, we tested how variations in presentation parameters and expression type influence identification rate and facial reactions, measured with electromyography (EMG). Participants made force-choice identifications of brief expressions (happy/angry/neutral). Stimulus and presentation properties were varied (duration, face set, masking-type). In addition, as their identification strategy, one group of participants was instructed to use their bodily and feeling changes. One control group was instructed to focus on visual details, and another group received no strategy instructions. The results revealed distinct EMG responses, with greatest corrugator activity to angry, then neutral, and least to happy faces. All variations in stimulus and presentation properties had robust and parallel effects on both identification and EMG. Corrugator EMG was reliable enough to statistically predict stimulus valence. However, instructions to focus on the internal states did not improve identification rates or change physiological responses. These findings suggest that brief expressions produce a robust bodily signal, which could in principle be used as feedback to improve identification. However, the fact that participants did not improve with internal focus suggests that bodily and feeling reactions are either principally unconscious, or that other ways of training or instruction are necessary to make use of their feedback potential. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 124
页数:9
相关论文
共 56 条
[11]   Amygdala reactivity predicts automatic negative evaluations for facial emotions [J].
Dannlowski, Udo ;
Ohrmann, Patricia ;
Bauer, Jochen ;
Kugel, Harald ;
Arolt, Volker ;
Heindel, Walter ;
Suslow, Thomas .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH-NEUROIMAGING, 2007, 154 (01) :13-20
[12]   Unconscious facial reactions to emotional facial expressions [J].
Dimberg, U ;
Thunberg, M ;
Elmehed, K .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2000, 11 (01) :86-89
[13]   Facial reactions to emotional stimuli: Automatically controlled emotional responses [J].
Dimberg, U ;
Thunberg, M ;
Grunedal, S .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 2002, 16 (04) :449-471
[14]  
Ekman P., 1976, Pictures of facial affect
[15]  
Ekman P., 2006, WASHINGTONPOST 1029
[16]   GUIDELINES FOR HUMAN ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC RESEARCH [J].
FRIDLUND, AJ ;
CACIOPPO, JT .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1986, 23 (05) :567-589
[17]   Simulationist models of face-based emotion recognition [J].
Goldman, AI ;
Sripada, CS .
COGNITION, 2005, 94 (03) :193-213
[18]  
Hart W., 1987, ART LIVING VIPASSANA
[19]   Facial mimicry and emotional contagion to dynamic emotional facial expressions and their influence on decoding accuracy [J].
Hess, U ;
Blairy, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 40 (02) :129-141
[20]  
Hess U., 1999, SOCIAL CONTEXT NONVE, P213