Improved Automated Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy on a Publicly Available Dataset Through Integration of Deep Learning

被引:684
作者
Abramoff, Michael David [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lou, Yiyue [4 ]
Erginay, Ali [5 ]
Clarida, Warren [3 ]
Amelon, Ryan [3 ]
Folk, James C. [1 ,3 ]
Niemeijer, Meindert [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Hosp & Clin, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Iowa City, IA USA
[2] Iowa City Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Iowa City, IA USA
[3] IDx LLC, Iowa City, IA USA
[4] Univ Iowa, Dept Stat, Coll Publ Hlth, Iowa City, IA USA
[5] Hop Lariboisiere, AP HP, Serv Ophtalmol, Paris, France
关键词
diabetic retinopathy; detection; deep learning; algorithm; diabetes; MACULAR EDEMA; SCREENING EXAMINATIONS; IMAGE-ANALYSIS; TELEMEDICINE; PHOTOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1167/iovs.16-19964
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. To compare performance of a deep-learning enhanced algorithm for automated detection of diabetic retinopathy (DR), to the previously published performance of that algorithm, the Iowa Detection Program (IDP)-without deep learning components-on the same publicly available set of fundus images and previously reported consensus reference standard set, by three US Board certified retinal specialists. METHODS. We used the previously reported consensus reference standard of referable DR (rDR), defined as International Clinical Classification of Diabetic Retinopathy moderate, severe nonproliferative (NPDR), proliferative DR, and/or macular edema (ME). Neither Messidor-2 images, nor the three retinal specialists setting the Messidor-2 reference standard were used for training IDx-DR version X2.1. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, area under the curve (AUC), and their confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS. Sensitivity was 96.8% (95% CI: 93.3%-98.8%), specificity was 87.0% (95% CI: 84.2%-89.4%), with 6/874 false negatives, resulting in a negative predictive value of 99.0% (95% CI: 97.8%-99.6%). No cases of severe NPDR, PDR, or ME were missed. The AUC was 0.980 (95% CI: 0.968-0.992). Sensitivity was not statistically different from published IDP sensitivity, which had a CI of 94.4% to 99.3%, but specificity was significantly better than the published IDP specificity CI of 55.7% to 63.0%. CONCLUSIONS. A deep-learning enhanced algorithm for the automated detection of DR, achieves significantly better performance than a previously reported, otherwise essentially identical, algorithm that does not employ deep learning. Deep learning enhanced algorithms have the potential to improve the efficiency of DR screening, and thereby to prevent visual loss and blindness from this devastating disease.
引用
收藏
页码:5200 / 5206
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [31] Automated Assessment of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Using Content-Based Image Retrieval in Multimodal Fundus Photographs
    Quellec, Gwenole
    Lamard, Mathieu
    Cazuguel, Guy
    Bekri, Lynda
    Daccache, Wissam
    Roux, Christian
    Cochener, Beatrice
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2011, 52 (11) : 8342 - 8348
  • [32] Optimal Filter Framework for Automated, Instantaneous Detection of Lesions in Retinal Images
    Quellec, Gwenole
    Russell, Stephen R.
    Abramoff, Michael D.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2011, 30 (02) : 523 - 533
  • [33] DREAM: Diabetic Retinopathy Analysis Using Machine Learning
    Roychowdhury, Sohini
    Koozekanani, Dara D.
    Parhi, Keshab K.
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2014, 18 (05) : 1717 - 1728
  • [34] Benefits of stereopsis when identifying clinically significant macular edema via teleophthalmology
    Rudnisky, Christopher J.
    Tennant, Matthew T. S.
    de Leon, Alexander R.
    Hinz, Bradley J.
    Greve, Mark D. J.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY-JOURNAL CANADIEN D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2006, 41 (06): : 727 - 732
  • [35] Comparison of two reference standards in validating two field mydriatic digital photography as a method of screening for diabetic retinopathy
    Scanlon, PH
    Malhotra, R
    Greenwood, RH
    Aldington, SJ
    Foy, C
    Flatman, M
    Downes, S
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 87 (10) : 1258 - 1263
  • [36] Simonyan K., 2014, 14091556 ARXIV, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.INFSOF.2008.09.005
  • [37] The Future of Ultrawide Field Imaging for Diabetic Retinopathy Pondering the Retinal Periphery
    Sun, Jennifer K.
    Aiello, Lloyd Paul
    [J]. JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 134 (03) : 247 - 248
  • [38] Validating Retinal Fundus Image Analysis Algorithms: Issues and a Proposal
    Trucco, Emanuele
    Ruggeri, Alfredo
    Karnowski, Thomas
    Giancardo, Luca
    Chaum, Edward
    Hubschman, Jean Pierre
    al-Diri, Bashir
    Cheung, Carol Y.
    Wong, Damon
    Abramoff, Michael
    Lim, Gilbert
    Kumar, Dinesh
    Burlina, Philippe
    Bressler, Neil M.
    Jelinek, Herbert F.
    Meriaudeau, Fabrice
    Quellec, Gwenole
    MacGillivray, Tom
    Dhillon, Bal
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (05) : 3546 - 3559
  • [39] Comparison of Prevalence of Diabetic Macular Edema Based on Monocular Fundus Photography vs Optical Coherence Tomography
    Wang, Yu T.
    Tadarati, Mongkol
    Wolfson, Yulia
    Bressler, Susan B.
    Bressler, Neil M.
    [J]. JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 134 (02) : 222 - 228
  • [40] Proposed international clinical diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema disease severity scales
    Wilkinson, CP
    Ferris, FL
    Klein, RE
    Lee, PP
    Agardh, CD
    Davis, M
    Dills, D
    Kampik, A
    Pararajasegaram, R
    Verdaguer, JT
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 110 (09) : 1677 - 1682