Effects of different anionic surfactants on methane hydrate formation

被引:123
作者
Wang, Fei [1 ,2 ]
Jia, Zhen-Zhen [3 ]
Luo, Sheng-Jun [1 ]
Fu, Shan-Fei [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Lin [1 ]
Shi, Xiao-Shuang [1 ]
Wang, Chuan-Shui [1 ]
Guo, Rong-Bo [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Qingdao Inst Bioenergy & Bioproc Technol, Shandong Ind Engn Lab Biogas Prod & Utilizat, Qingdao 266101, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Guizhou Univ, Guiyang 550025, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Methane hydrates; Anionic surfactants; Induction time; Contact angle; Hydrate growth; SODIUM DODECYL-SULFATE; UNSTIRRED GAS/LIQUID SYSTEM; GAS HYDRATE; AMBIENT-TEMPERATURE; FORMING CONDITIONS; FORMATION KINETICS; AQUEOUS-SOLUTION; ALKYL SULFATES; STORAGE; SOLUBILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ces.2015.07.021
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
In this work, the effects of anionic surfactants on methane hydrate formation were studied. For comparison, three anionic surfactants with the same carbon chain but different head groups, sodium dodecyl sulfonate (SDSN), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate (SDBS) were used. SOBS was detected to form micelles under hydrate formation conditions, while SDSN and SDS precipitated before micelles were formed. As a result, concentrations of SDSN and SOS did not show obvious influence on the promotion effect to methane hydrate formation, while the concentration of SOBS significantly affected the promotion effect because of the micelle effect. When SDSN and SDS were used hydrates grew upwards on the reactor wall due to the relatively narrow contact angle of the surfactant solutions on the reactor sidewall, while SDBS led to the hydrates formed mainly in the bottom of the reactor as a result of the relatively wide contact angle. In addition, SDSN and SDS led to much higher growth rate in comparison to SOBS due to the upward growth of hydrates on the reactor sidewall. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:896 / 903
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Surfactant effects on hydrate formation in an unstirred gas/liquid system: An experimental study using methane and micelle-forming surfactants [J].
Ando, Naoki ;
Kuwabara, Yui ;
Mori, Yasuhiko H. .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2012, 73 :79-85
[2]  
[Anonymous], P 2 INT C NAT GAS HY
[3]  
Carre A, 1989, PHENOME INTERFACE AG, P99
[4]  
Chen J.Y., 1992, CHIN J APPL CHEM, V9, P18
[5]   Effect of surfactant carbon chain length on hydrate formation kinetics [J].
Daimaru, Takamichi ;
Yamasaki, Akihiro ;
Yanagisawa, Yukio .
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2007, 56 (1-3) :89-96
[6]   Surfactant promoting effects on clathrate hydrate formation: Are micelles really involved? [J].
Di Profio, P ;
Arca, S ;
Germani, R ;
Savelli, G .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2005, 60 (15) :4141-4145
[7]   Novel nanostructured media for gas storage and transport: Clathrate hydrates of methane and hydrogen [J].
Di Profio, Pietro ;
Arca, Simone ;
Germani, Raimondo ;
Savelli, Gianfranco .
JOURNAL OF FUEL CELL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 4 (01) :49-55
[8]   Effects of ionic surfactants on methane hydrate formation kinetics in a static system [J].
Du, Jianwei ;
Li, Huijuan ;
Wang, Liguang .
ADVANCED POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 25 (04) :1227-1233
[9]  
[杜文琴 DU Wenqin], 2007, [纺织学报, Journal of Textile Research], V28, P29
[10]   Effect of different surfactants on methane hydrate formation rate, stability and storage capacity [J].
Ganji, H. ;
Manteghian, M. ;
Zadeh, K. Sadaghlani ;
Omidkhah, M. R. ;
Mofrad, H. Rahimi .
FUEL, 2007, 86 (03) :434-441