Intermittent bolus dosing of ceftazidime in critically ill patients

被引:75
|
作者
Young, RJ
Lipman, J
Gin, T
Gomersall, CD
Joynt, GM
Oh, TE
机构
[1] CHINESE UNIV HONG KONG,PRINCE WALES HOSP,DEPT ANAESTHESIA & INTENS CARE,SHATIN,NEW TERRITORIES,HONG KONG
[2] BARAGWANATH HOSP,INTENS CARE UNIT,ZA-2013 JOHANNESBURG,SOUTH AFRICA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jac/40.2.269
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Ceftazidime is frequently used in critically ill patients, particularly for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. The recommended dosing regimen is based on pharmacokinetic data obtained in healthy volunteers and may not be appropriate in the critically iii. We administered ceftazidime in the maximum recommended dose (2 g iv every 8 h) to ten critically ill patients with normal plasma creatinine. Eighteen arterial blood samples were taken from each patient over the first 8 h for measurement of ceftazidime concentrations and subsequent compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis. An additional trough sample was taken from each patient on day 3. Although mean pharmacokinetic variables did not differ from previously reported data in normal volunteers there was wide variability in plasma drug concentrations. Three of our patients had plasma ceftazidime concentrations less than the MIC for P. aeruginosa (8 mg/L) and nine had concentrations less than 5 x MIG, which has been recommended to ensure efficacy. On day 3 trough ceftazidime concentrations were less than the MIC in four out of the seven patients in whom measurements were made and less than 5 x MIC in the remaining three. There was no clinical predictor of which patients would have low plasma concentrations. Our results show that plasma concentrations of ceftazidime are very variable when the recommended intermittent bolus dosing regimen is used and may result in inadequate plasma concentrations of drug in critical infections. This may result in treatment failure and the emergence of antibiotic resistance. A loading dose followed by continuous infusion should overcome these problems but this awaits in-vivo evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 273
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intermittent and continuous ceftazidime infusion for critically ill trauma patients
    Hanes, SD
    Wood, GC
    Herring, V
    Croce, MA
    Fabian, TC
    Pritchard, E
    Boucher, BA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 179 (06): : 436 - 440
  • [2] Continuous infusion of vancomycin is superior to intermittent dosing in critically ill patients
    Potts, S.
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 31 (02) : 124 - 124
  • [3] Altered pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime in critically ill patients
    Gómez, CMH
    Cordingly, JJ
    Palazzo, MGA
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1999, 43 (07) : 1798 - 1802
  • [4] Meropenem dosing in critically ill patients with sepsis and without renal dysfunction: intermittent bolus versus continuous administration? Monte Carlo dosing simulations and subcutaneous tissue distribution
    Roberts, Jason A.
    Kirkpatrick, Carl M. J.
    Roberts, Michael S.
    Robertson, Thomas A.
    Dalley, Andrew J.
    Lipman, Jeffrey
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2009, 64 (01) : 142 - 150
  • [5] Gentamicin dosing in critically ill patients
    Hansen, M
    Christrup, LL
    Jarlov, JO
    Kampmann, JP
    Bonde, J
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2001, 45 (06) : 734 - 740
  • [6] Antifungal dosing in critically ill patients
    Bergman S.J.
    Tyagi I.
    Ronald K.
    Current Fungal Infection Reports, 2010, 4 (2) : 78 - 86
  • [7] Evaluation of Meropenem Extended Versus Intermittent Infusion Dosing Protocol in Critically Ill Patients
    Ahmed, Nabeela
    Jen, Shin-Pung
    Altshuler, Diana
    Papadopoulos, John
    Pham, Vinh P.
    Dubrovskaya, Yanina
    JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (08) : 763 - 771
  • [8] Cefepime in critically ill patients: continuous infusion vs. an intermittent dosing regimen
    Georges, B
    Conil, JM
    Cougot, P
    Decun, JF
    Archambaud, M
    Seguin, T
    Chabanon, G
    Virenque, C
    Houin, G
    Saivin, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 43 (08) : 360 - 369
  • [9] Paralysis in the critically ill: Intermittent bolus pancuronium compared with continuous infusion
    de Lemos, JM
    Carr, RR
    Shalansky, KF
    Bevan, DR
    Ronco, JJ
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (12) : 2648 - 2655
  • [10] Methods of Enteral Nutrition Administration in Critically Ill Patients: Continuous, Cyclic, Intermittent, and Bolus Feeding
    Ichimaru, Satomi
    NUTRITION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 33 (06) : 790 - 795