Applying Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to the Life-Cycle Assessment of vehicles

被引:55
作者
Domingues, Ana Rita [1 ]
Marques, Pedro [2 ]
Garcia, Rita [2 ]
Freire, Fausto [2 ]
Dias, Luis C. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] INESC Coimbra, P-3000033 Coimbra, Portugal
[2] Univ Coimbra, ADAI LAETA Dept Engn Mecan, P-3030788 Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Univ Coimbra, Fac Econ, P-3004512 Coimbra, Portugal
关键词
Environmental indicators; Life-Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA); Normalization; Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA); ELECTRE TRI; Light-duty vehicles; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; ASSESSMENT MODEL; HYBRID; LCA; CLASSIFICATION; NORMALIZATION; SUPPORT; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.086
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article presents a methodology to classify light-duty vehicles according to their environmental impacts. The classification is based on Life-Cycle Impact Assessment indicators and vehicle operation indicators, which are aggregated using a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) method. In contrast with most literature combining Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) and MCDA, vehicles are not compared directly; they are compared to pre-established profiles defining a set of classes. These profiles are established relatively to the impacts of the country's light-duty fleet. The ELECTRE TRI method is chosen for MCDA classification, thus avoiding complete substitutability among criteria and allowing for imprecision in the data. MCDA typically incorporates the subjective values of decision makers, namely through criteria weighting. To obtain conclusions that are not contingent on a given weight vector, we consider a space of weight vectors defined by constraints with a clear rationale and obtain all the possible results compatible with those constraints. The methodology is applied to classify six vehicles available in Portugal with different powertrains: Gasoline and Diesel Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles, Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (10 and 40-mile battery range) and Battery Electric Vehicle. The discussion suggests how this methodology might be useful for a decision-making entity that wishes to classify vehicles according to their environmental impacts. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:749 / 759
页数:11
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   A streamlined LCA framework to support early decision making in vehicle development [J].
Arena, Marika ;
Azzone, Giovanni ;
Conte, Antonio .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 41 :105-113
[2]  
Belton V., 2002, MULIPLE CRITERIA DEC
[3]   Environmental analyses of land transportation systems in The Netherlands [J].
Bouwman, ME ;
Moll, HC .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 7 (05) :331-345
[4]  
Ceuster GD., 2007, TREMOVE - Service contract for the further development and application of the transport and environmental TREMOVE model Lot 1 (Improvement of the data set and model structure)
[5]   An introduction to 'benefit of the doubt' composite indicators [J].
Cherchye, Laurens ;
Moesen, Willem ;
Rogge, Nicky ;
Van Puyenbroeck, Tom .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2007, 82 (01) :111-145
[6]   Comparison of different normalised LCIA results and their feasibility in communication [J].
Dahlbo, Helena ;
Koskela, Sirkka ;
Pihkola, Hanna ;
Nors, Minna ;
Federley, Maija ;
Seppala, Jyri .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (04) :850-860
[7]   From green product definitions and classifications to the Green Option Matrix [J].
Dangelico, Rosa Maria ;
Pontrandolfo, Pierpaolo .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2010, 18 (16-17) :1608-1628
[8]  
DAT, 2014, GUID FUEL CONS CO2 E
[9]   An aggregation/disaggregation approach to obtain robust conclusions with ELECTRE TRI [J].
Dias, L ;
Mousseau, V ;
Figueira, J ;
Clímaco, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 138 (02) :332-348
[10]  
Dias L.C., 2003, J MULTI-CRITERIA DEC, V12, P285, DOI [10.1002/mcda.364, DOI 10.1002/MCDA.364]